piers morgan was forced to correct an error in an interview with naomi seibt recently.Seibt is new on the scene and has already been grilled live on television. I can respect that.
You won't ever see sock puppet Greta in that position. Its all one way screeching , no engagement. Imagine Andrew Neil asking her questions. She wouldn't 10 seconds.
We had this discussion around KSI vs. Logan Paul (two names I've first heard about on a boxing forum). These influencer PPVs gain a lot of attention, so regular boxers on the Greta vs. AntiGreta undercard could get excellent exposure.Do we really need to give time to all these teenage female attention seekers?
the justification is that the acorn1 calculation was not accurate when compared to modern weather, so they tried to get a better one. from what i can see this is legitimate and the old data should be improved.piers morgan was forced to correct an error in an interview with naomi seibt recently.
he said do you believe the world is warming at a dangerous rate.
she said no i don't.
he said so you are saying there is no warming.
she said there may be some amount of global warming.
he said so you just said there wasn't.
she said no i didn't say that, i was replying to your comment is there catastrophic warming, to which i said no.
he said no i didn't say that, i just asked whether you think there is warming.
the viewers went nuts and he was forced to correct it on air.
more annoying was his refusal to let the girl speak.
every time she went to answer his question he started shouting over the top of her.
yet the other girl, the pro-gw, had no interruption and was given a complete stage to voice her view.
that's what i can't stand on this topic, the one-sidedness.
just recently our own bureau of meteorology was found again tampering with temperature records to make the past cooler than it really was.
an absolute disgrace.
the australian town of marble bar has had the world's longest heatwave record, set in 1923-1924.
160 days over 100F
now they have 'corrected' the data so that its not over 100F for 160 days.
no justification given.
that record has stood for over 90 years and now suddenly its wrong?
give me a break.
they are obviously stumped as the fact stands there were much hotter temperatures in the past and that of course discredits the global warming hypothesis.
this is scientific fraud of the highest order and these people should be prosecuted.