Insane SJW examples of bullshit "microaggressions"

May 21, 2013
4,209
2,000
OK

except that he conflated 'migrants' and 'refugees' and he doesnt actually have an issue with european 'migrants'

so he either misused the statistics PURPOSLY to paint a false picture or he isnt smart enough to have got it right

his 'metaphorical truth' is thus based entirely on his incorrect use of the numbers there

and that was hardly the only example

he is a superficial twat pretending to be a 'liberal' while doing nothing but attack the left,often dishonestly............have you EVER seen him go after the 'right' in any way?

its embarrassingly transparent stuff IMHO...........
reminds me of this..


 

Broxi

Literal Communist
Jul 24, 2012
8,905
8,738
this guy does a good job of exposing Sargons shtick for what it is.........

First off, this guy is annoying as fuck and I'm actually listening to this on 1.5x speed to make it bearable.

First 10:00 mins - Digital Assistants and their responses to "sexist" abuse e.g. calling Siri a bitch (which isn't sexist, it's just abusing a robot for a laugh ffs), the Youtuber suggests that this is actually a relevant point the article author is making because as time goes on people will turn to these AI assistants for more important question and points out that the response to questions regarding suicide offer helpful responses, so therefore why doesn't Siri lecture us on sexism when we call her bitch?

Well that's because a) Apple understands the difference between someone insulting a robot for lolz over a legitimate cry for help and b) no one wants lectured by an AI on sexism for calling her a bitch or a cunt.

I completely agree with Sargon that this is pointless and laughable feminist whinging and as for why he would then pay it any attention, well that's because his channel focuses on pointless feminist whinging (as does this thread btw)

Next 10:00 mins - He claims Sargon is cutting off the paragraph before realising the author refutes the initial sentence, I think this is his claim anyway but regardless Sargon is not doing this, Sargon is arguing with "the many people who argue capitalism is inherently sexist", which it isn't of course for all the reasons he points out, it sin't anything, it's a market system.

He then makes some ridiculous point about Sargon arguing Capitalism not being sexist because of the porn industry( ?) and he has the gaul to talk about mis-reading or representing a point? Sargons point was that companies utilise womens sexuality because sex sells... like using attractive women in tv adverts... it's nothing to do with pornography, the fucking dolt.

Then, he tries to paint Sargons interest in this article as some conspiracy theory that SJWs are trying to infiltrate companies and institutions in order to exert their power and mould public opinion... because of course, they certainly aren't trying to do that, are they? I mean, the countless examples of this very thing in this thread stretching back years to the original Gamergate doesn't demonstrate this does it?

It's pretty fucking obvious at this point that's exactly what they've tried to do.

Sorry, I gave up at this point when he went on to suggest that only the straight white men complaining because they're currently on top of everything and don't want to change anything... because of course, that's an honest representation of the SJW woke brigade...

Fuck that shit.
 
May 21, 2013
4,209
2,000
First off, this guy is annoying as fuck and I'm actually listening to this on 1.5x speed to make it bearable.

First 10:00 mins - Digital Assistants and their responses to "sexist" abuse e.g. calling Siri a bitch (which isn't sexist, it's just abusing a robot for a laugh ffs), the Youtuber suggests that this is actually a relevant point the article author is making because as time goes on people will turn to these AI assistants for more important question and points out that the response to questions regarding suicide offer helpful responses, so therefore why doesn't Siri lecture us on sexism when we call her bitch?

Well that's because a) Apple understands the difference between someone insulting a robot for lolz over a legitimate cry for help and b) no one wants lectured by an AI on sexism for calling her a bitch or a cunt.

I completely agree with Sargon that this is pointless and laughable feminist whinging and as for why he would then pay it any attention, well that's because his channel focuses on pointless feminist whinging (as does this thread btw)

Next 10:00 mins - He claims Sargon is cutting off the paragraph before realising the author refutes the initial sentence, I think this is his claim anyway but regardless Sargon is not doing this, Sargon is arguing with "the many people who argue capitalism is inherently sexist", which it isn't of course for all the reasons he points out, it sin't anything, it's a market system.

He then makes some ridiculous point about Sargon arguing Capitalism not being sexist because of the porn industry( ?) and he has the gaul to talk about mis-reading or representing a point? Sargons point was that companies utilise womens sexuality because sex sells... like using attractive women in tv adverts... it's nothing to do with pornography, the fucking dolt.

Then, he tries to paint Sargons interest in this article as some conspiracy theory that SJWs are trying to infiltrate companies and institutions in order to exert their power and mould public opinion... because of course, they certainly aren't trying to do that, are they? I mean, the countless examples of this very thing in this thread stretching back years to the original Gamergate doesn't demonstrate this does it?

It's pretty fucking obvious at this point that's exactly what they've tried to do.

Sorry, I gave up at this point when he went on to suggest that only the straight white men complaining because they're currently on top of everything and don't want to change anything... because of course, that's an honest representation of the SJW woke brigade...

Fuck that shit.

i had a look and his channel is more of the same "your not exactly, PRECISELY right therefore youre completely wrong" bullshit... the usual leftist semantic rubbish
 

Broxi

Literal Communist
Jul 24, 2012
8,905
8,738
The logic here is completely wrong, where I agree with him that "nut-picking" is a common fallacy among the right and the left (we saw this recently with mainstream UK news outlets and Brexit supporters for example) and I can't stand it myself but he begins the video with legitimate examples of this, from MSM/YT street interviews with batshit crazy Trump supporters and protesters, etc but when it comes to Sargons examples of nut-picking... who are the subjects he lists?

Corbyn, AOC, Sarkeesian, Lily Allen, Michael Moore, University Professors, MSM hosts, people who claim the earth has 12 years till the apocalypse i.e. Greta Thumberg ... are these not credible and highly influential figures on the left?

Cortez, a US Senator... with massive reach and influence?
Jeremy Corbyn... the Labour leader and at one point, potential UK Prime Minister?
Michael Moore - world famous documentary maker and activist?
Lilly Allen - rich and famous pop singer and daughter of TV personality?
Jess Phillips - famous feminist Labour MP and recent candidate for leader of the opposition?

I mean the list could go on and on (Owen Jones), you can claim these are far out there nuts who aren't representative of the left on the whole but who has more influence and clout... any of the above people or some borderline retard in a pub failing to articulate any good reason why he supports X ?

Sargon will occasionally show some clip of some batshit Antifa supporter or mad Communist and laugh at them (which can be fun sometimes too) but that's far from the bulk of his work, he generally focuses on people with power and clout and the ability to influence institutions and one thing no one can claim is that he will duck anyone.

The YTer seems fairly centrist and even, I'll watch a bit more of his content but I think he just completely missed the mark here.
 
Reactions: rusty nails
Jun 4, 2012
28,494
19,103
Sargon was pretty good years back, and dismantled a lot of the lies of Sarkeesian and gamergate well, but he's completely insufferable now and has either moved very much to the right or hid how right-wing he was in the past. Regardless, his faux laughing and stream of videos pandering to the stereotypical "angry white male", that the SJW mob are obsessed with, is awful viewing.
 

Masters

Bone 4 Tuna
May 20, 2013
10,830
2,018
Vice City
https://news.sky.com/story/slowthai-rapper-apologises-to-katherine-ryan-for-shameful-nme-awards-altercation-11933080

Thats the pond life NME celebrates and gives a stage to , meanwhile anti-establishment , animal rights activist , devout veganist Morrissey is vilified as some sort of Nazi. In case anybody doesn't know the NME has been on a hate campaign against Morrissey for the last year or two. He wouldn't be even allowed attend the awards never mind get nominated for one.

Don't know much about Slowthai , but he's probably another POS like Stormzy who blames everybody for London knife crime except the actual Mayor of London. His crap grime music is also the soundtrack to London gang culture.
 
Reactions: joe33

SwollenGoat

Deicide
May 17, 2013
53,340
14,705
The House that Peterbilt
First off, this guy is annoying as fuck and I'm actually listening to this on 1.5x speed to make it bearable.

First 10:00 mins - Digital Assistants and their responses to "sexist" abuse e.g. calling Siri a bitch (which isn't sexist, it's just abusing a robot for a laugh ffs), the Youtuber suggests that this is actually a relevant point the article author is making because as time goes on people will turn to these AI assistants for more important question and points out that the response to questions regarding suicide offer helpful responses, so therefore why doesn't Siri lecture us on sexism when we call her bitch?

Well that's because a) Apple understands the difference between someone insulting a robot for lolz over a legitimate cry for help and b) no one wants lectured by an AI on sexism for calling her a bitch or a cunt.

I completely agree with Sargon that this is pointless and laughable feminist whinging and as for why he would then pay it any attention, well that's because his channel focuses on pointless feminist whinging (as does this thread btw)

Next 10:00 mins - He claims Sargon is cutting off the paragraph before realising the author refutes the initial sentence, I think this is his claim anyway but regardless Sargon is not doing this, Sargon is arguing with "the many people who argue capitalism is inherently sexist", which it isn't of course for all the reasons he points out, it sin't anything, it's a market system.

He then makes some ridiculous point about Sargon arguing Capitalism not being sexist because of the porn industry( ?) and he has the gaul to talk about mis-reading or representing a point? Sargons point was that companies utilise womens sexuality because sex sells... like using attractive women in tv adverts... it's nothing to do with pornography, the fucking dolt.

Then, he tries to paint Sargons interest in this article as some conspiracy theory that SJWs are trying to infiltrate companies and institutions in order to exert their power and mould public opinion... because of course, they certainly aren't trying to do that, are they? I mean, the countless examples of this very thing in this thread stretching back years to the original Gamergate doesn't demonstrate this does it?

It's pretty fucking obvious at this point that's exactly what they've tried to do.

Sorry, I gave up at this point when he went on to suggest that only the straight white men complaining because they're currently on top of everything and don't want to change anything... because of course, that's an honest representation of the SJW woke brigade...

Fuck that shit.
:lol:

thats fine

I guess

PERSONALLY I think he dies a good job of breaking down Sargons superficial nonsense................Sargon is like Ben Shapiro lite...........who grew up on a diet of paintchips and was repeatedly dropped on his head...............the faux outrage and the basic misuse of facts is,quite frankly,appalling

BTW................you should have held on to the end where he got to Sargons inability to properly use statistics.........
 

SwollenGoat

Deicide
May 17, 2013
53,340
14,705
The House that Peterbilt
i had a look and his channel is more of the same "your not exactly, PRECISELY right therefore youre completely wrong" bullshit... the usual leftist semantic rubbish
'semantics' = be correct when you claim to be stating facts?

Okeydokey

Sargon is an intellectually lazy faux outrage hack who panders to folks too lazy themselves to check on the facts.............

IMHO :sun
 

SwollenGoat

Deicide
May 17, 2013
53,340
14,705
The House that Peterbilt
Sargon was pretty good years back, and dismantled a lot of the lies of Sarkeesian and gamergate well, but he's completely insufferable now and has either moved very much to the right or hid how right-wing he was in the past. Regardless, his faux laughing and stream of videos pandering to the stereotypical "angry white male", that the SJW mob are obsessed with, is awful viewing.
this
 
Reactions: Strike
May 16, 2013
8,181
6,600
I really don't understand these 'Content creators' who put up a page of text from a newspaper and proceed to read it to you whilst laughing and giving their opinion. Who enjoys that?

I end up pausing the video and reading it myself. I think the quality of a lot of these channels declines once the 'influencer' decided to appear in body. I found Sargon interesting before he became Carl Benjamin and put his points across seriously. Now he's just another self obsessed prick.
 
Reactions: Joe and Haggis

Deebo

"Messkin" Deebo
Jun 5, 2013
16,150
11,804
Show dem balls bro

Is there really any excuse for this or am I being overly sensitive?

I'm not sure but I think I'm part of the problem because I can't stop looking at them titties. And the ass too. Then both at the same time. You guys ever heard of a brumski? How about a bum brumski? Or Bumski? It's amazing how creative you get late at night. :bart
 
Jun 5, 2013
8,787
6,017
Oz
I'm not sure but I think I'm part of the problem because I can't stop looking at them titties. And the ass too. Then both at the same time. You guys ever heard of a brumski? How about a bum brumski? Or Bumski? It's amazing how creative you get late at night. :bart
I just get the urge to kick the fat, racist bitch right in the cunt.
 
Reactions: Joe