The Clinton Body Count

Nov 14, 2015
12,917
13,132
So,in short,no legit sources about wounds in the back of the head,or second and third gunshot wounds or any of that shit

Just Joe and VIno spewing shit they read someplace in the dumbest depths of the internet's conspiracy dumpsters..............

I,for one,am utterly shocked.....................

utterly
So according to Goat, the Congressional Record's someplace in the dumbest depths of the internet's conspiracy dumpsters .

But CNN's legit yeah
 

Haggis

CHB World Championship People's Champion
May 16, 2013
44,625
21,471
When you read the news you know. Amirite? Mr Right. Just for kicks, what sources do you rely upon? The Daily Kos is one. Snopes, of course. Any others?
Ah, snopes. What a piece of shit fake news outfit full of lies, right? So easy to catch them out in example after example of lying articles. Which is why you and Cucko and co did such a great job of just that over a few hundred posts in the Snopes thread, right? :lol:

:hat
 

Haggis

CHB World Championship People's Champion
May 16, 2013
44,625
21,471
Cucko and DBerry both viewing this thread. What's the over/under on one of them posting something utterly braindead and the other one pressing "like" on it within 10 seconds? Bonus points if Cucko posts a link to a ridiculous article from a conspiracy site, and Dale automatically presses "like" on it sight unseen, before enough time has passed that he can even pretend he's read it.

:hat
 
Nov 14, 2015
12,917
13,132
Cucko and DBerry both viewing this thread. What's the over/under on one of them posting something utterly braindead and the other one pressing "like" on it within 10 seconds? Bonus points if Cucko posts a link to a ridiculous article from a conspiracy site, and Dale automatically presses "like" on it sight unseen, before enough time has passed that he can even pretend he's read it.

:hat
It's the weekend. Shouldn't you be out on a first date seeing a kiddie movie and coming home for some smocking and cosplaying?
 

Haggis

CHB World Championship People's Champion
May 16, 2013
44,625
21,471
Betcha the ignored content is a stupid meme that either straight up lies or else says nothing at all, and then a bunch of babble about how I'm an autist or a faggit or whatever.

:hat
 

SwollenGoat

Deicide
May 17, 2013
67,271
26,267
The House that Peterbilt
Fuck it up, again. Mr Right. Who said there were 2 wounds to the back of his head? Do you just make shit up as you go along now? Create a reality to jibe with your uninformed opinions? :lol:
um

@VinoVeritas said it


Is it possible to commit suicide by shooting yourself in the back of your head, twice?
Its a popular part of the conspiracy

I did not accuse YOU SPECIFICALLY of it

YOU simply said there was a second wound,via WND

Fuck Joe,I DDNT EVEN SPECIFICALLY SAY TWO IN THE BACK OF THE HEAD,I said 'wounds in the back of the head or second or third wounds' which can obviously refer to your 'theory' as well.

You fail

Fuuck yer kinda slow,eh?

Care to address the lack of blood spatter at the scene? Lack of blood on the gun, cuff on the shirt, and hand which he used to shoot himself? Or is that a conspiracy?
I dont care because your brain doesn't work.

There isnt any evidence that will convince you and no number of your false claims being exposed will dissuade you..........

Plus yer a cranky old shit who wont give a straight answer to a straight question

Ill just stick to correcting you,OK?
 

Joe E

Proud Shitholer
Jul 29, 2012
23,249
9,666
um

@VinoVeritas said it




Its a popular part of the conspiracy

I did not accuse YOU SPECIFICALLY of it

YOU simply said there was a second wound,via WND

Fuck Joe,I DDNT EVEN SPECIFICALLY SAY TWO IN THE BACK OF THE HEAD,I said 'wounds in the back of the head or second or third wounds' which can obviously refer to your 'theory' as well.

You fail

Fuuck yer kinda slow,eh?


I dont care because your brain doesn't work.

There isnt any evidence that will convince you and no number of your false claims being exposed will dissuade you..........

Plus yer a cranky old shit who wont give a straight answer to a straight question

Ill just stick to correcting you,OK?
Stick to being irrelevant and shunned. You're good at that.
 
Nov 4, 2015
3,574
1,551
Trump's economy?

Had the economy been tending upwards or downwards for several years when Trump took office? Let's revisit this issue in 2020.
So whose economy is it then? Obama? :lol:

Why?

She's an idiot Incoming Congresswoman who has no idea how anything works, hasn't even been sworn in yet and will spend the next few years in the most junior group of a cast of hundreds.

He's the fucking President. There is no comparison.
How did a person who knows nothing about the country and how it works get a seat in congress?

You morons talk shit about the right electing a president who spoke exactly the right words to turn America around as though he were inept when you supported the election of the most inept person in congress today.

This dumpster fire argument that Trump is inept or out of control is 100% MSM induced koolaid and you got drunk on it.

One was handed more than $400 million by Daddy, hasn't grown it at all, went bankrupt six times and couldn't make money running a casino, you mean.

And yeah, it's hard for an ordinary millennial who wasn't born to a real estate empire to afford to move to DC and set up an apartment before her new six figure salary starts to kick in. What a scandal, right?
400 million isn't 3 billion. So yes, by any mathematical standard his wealth has grown. When you don't have an agenda and aren't a total moron it's easy to see this.

She doesn't even have rent money. Holy fuck think of the ramifications here. She's already tucked a UBI benefit package into her goals for congress. UBI being so bad an idea even the most Socialist countries think it's a bad deal.

Which Democrats do you mean? The ones who instantly shut down her grandstanding against Pelosi?

Are you defending Trump by bashing the nonexistent Ocasio-Cortez 2024 campaign? What are you even saying? She's a media darling because she pulled off a huge upset that nobody saw coming for a second, she's an outsider candidate and she's extremely media-savvy and Twitter-friendly. Why are you so offended by her? She's the Democrat's version of Trump, except she has no real power and no path to getting any for many years at least.
She's going to run and she will take a lot of democrats down with her. Why? Because the truth is the left is the cult. They are the exact personas they claim the right are. 100% celebrity politicians who are financially and culturally inept. The only reason they stay competitive is they leverage the urban coastlines which are full of people just like them. People with no idea how the country works.

It's true. More and more henchmen are flipping, more and more charges are being filed and jail sentences handed out. :lol:
You mean perjury. We'll see if those bullshit claims go anywhere. Looks like a judge has already ordered Mueller to disclose the interviews with Flynn and what did Mueller do? He advised no charges. :lol:

Anything like saying oh well there was dirt on Manafort, YEARS before the 2016 campaign and then trying to tie it to your collusion delusion is autistic insanity.

Yeah, talking like this doesn't make you come off as particularly rational. "Demonic bitch"? Really? She's an elitist, greedy, workaholic ambitionbot. Not a fucking personification of evil. :patsch
Joseph Stalin was ambitious. Adolf Hitler was ambitious. Ghengis Khan was ambitious. Need I go on?

How does the most informed population the world has ever seen vote for such a cold bitch?
 
Reactions: Joe E
Nov 4, 2015
3,574
1,551
Um, globalism has been responsible for the greatest exodus from poverty in human history. The great majority of "the labourers of the world" don't live in the USA, you know. They've been a lot poorer than you have been, and for a lot longer, and their opportunities are on the up.
I want to address this one specifically as I think you and a lot of other morons still think globalism is a great deal for the world.

The coal mine was full of canaries, bells and whistles years ago when it was revealed that NAFTA was driving Mexican farmers into bankruptcy. All due to NAFTA allowing the biggest fish on both sides to swallow the smaller ones on both sides. When half a million Mexicans per year were fleeing to the US for economic protection it wasn't because Mexico kicked them out. It was because American corn put them out of business.

That wasn't the only example either. As the US market exodus continued, US companies went south to manufacture in places where slavery wouldn't be frowned on. Bay area elites pushed for more guest labor into the US to drive down tech wages and still push millions into Washington D.C. to increase these guest laborer allowances.

The evidence is clear. As we melt into a globalist dystopia fewer and fewer people hold wealth. Culture, norms and safety are all on the decline. At least in the west. This mongrelization of entire cultures has not worked for the many. It has only worked for the few with enough macro supply and power to crush everyone else.

Everyone else benefits from borders and the predictability those borders give. Borders mean big macro exchanges in supply and people are closely governed to protect local populations. When you smash those borders that protection is gone. Much like removing the fiber from your diet is actually a BAD thing. Some resistance to macro supply of product and people is necessary.
 
Reactions: Joe E