The Official Trump Thread

May 22, 2013
5,918
5,242
Parts Unknown
I’ve read two editorials on consecutive days in the same mainstream newspaper. Opinion pieces from a notorious conservative and a notorious liberal.
They both used identical quotes and key discussion points from the Trump/Putin talks.
-one article claims the left are pissed off because Trump is lying.
-the other claims the left are pissed of because Trump is telling the truth.

I’m not sure how there can be any constructive conversation when both sides won’t budge on their baseline stance. Trump is an enigma that drives people into a frenzy, whether that’s good or bad is debatable but it is certainly entertaining.

.......and fuck off.
 
May 19, 2013
22,332
3,391
Las Vegas
www.xvideos.com
I’ve read two editorials on consecutive days in the same mainstream newspaper. Opinion pieces from a notorious conservative and a notorious liberal.
They both used identical quotes and key discussion points from the Trump/Putin talks.
-one article claims the left are pissed off because Trump is lying.
-the other claims the left are pissed of because Trump is telling the truth.

I’m not sure how there can be any constructive conversation when both sides won’t budge on their baseline stance. Trump is an enigma that drives people into a frenzy, whether that’s good or bad is debatable but it is certainly entertaining.

.......and fuck off.
First real social media president.
 

V-2

[ [ Tech-Noir ] ]
Jan 1, 2017
3,479
5,116
Kármán Line
Okay lads, essentially the huge Trump thread has been fucking ruined by shitposting of memes and retarded bullshit, and the new one is quickly going down the same path. Now both are being closed because they're dogshit and irredeemable, and this thread is replacing it, with the following ground rules:

- No spamming and shitposting. This includes Longcat, Wiki chunks, Michelle Obama tranny shit, Snopes founder pics, stupid YouTube videos and so on. You all know when you're shitposting, and it's usually either in response to an actual legitimate point or article that's posted, or in response to other spam.
- No posting proven fake or clearly fake memes or articles. This includes Bernie Audi memes, Seth Rich stuff, articles from blatant conspiracy-peddling sites etc.
- No stalking posters. Coming into the thread with no intention to engage with any of the discussion other than to routinely call someone a cunt is fucking useless and pathetic.
- This one is more of a guideline than a rule, but at least try not being intellectually dishonest. This means blatant avoiding of answering questions, use of whataboutisms, dismissal of legit sources which don't agree with your viewpoint etc.

As you know, the modding is basically completely hands-off, but some rules have to be implemented here because some cunts can't be trusted to not shit up the thread again. Repeat offenders will be threadbanned temporarily, and then permanently if you're consistently spastic.:nazi

Anyway, that's the gist of it, so discuss away. :cheers
Ooh, rare power move; strong alpha pheromones coming from this post.

its madness
Leave it to Chris Wallace.

https://www.thedailybeast.com/fox-news-chris-wallace-presses-vladimir-putin-in-tense-interview-after-donald-trump-gives-him-a-pass

After President Donald Trump refused to confront Vladimir Putin over Russia’s direct interference in the 2016 U.S. election, Fox News host Chris Wallace decided to do it for him.

In an exclusive interview with the Russian president that followed his private meeting with Trump and their shocking joint press conference, Wallace literally held up Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s indictment of 12 Russian intelligence officers and demanded an explanation.

Putin appeared to laugh in Wallace’s face as he outlined the charges. When the host tried to hand him the stack of papers, the Russian president would not touch it, indicating that the host could place it on the table between them.

But unlike Trump, Wallace kept pressing him.

The host repeatedly interrupted Putin, asking how his denials can be true when the charges are outlined so specifically in the indictment. Putin, clearly not used to being interrupted when he speaks, grew increasingly agitated and told the host to be “patient,” saying, “let me finish” in several moments.


 
Reactions: DBerry and Joe E

Joe E

Proud Shitholer
Jul 29, 2012
22,807
9,301
Ooh, rare power move; strong alpha pheromones coming from this post.



Leave it to Chris Wallace.

https://www.thedailybeast.com/fox-news-chris-wallace-presses-vladimir-putin-in-tense-interview-after-donald-trump-gives-him-a-pass

After President Donald Trump refused to confront Vladimir Putin over Russia’s direct interference in the 2016 U.S. election, Fox News host Chris Wallace decided to do it for him.

In an exclusive interview with the Russian president that followed his private meeting with Trump and their shocking joint press conference, Wallace literally held up Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s indictment of 12 Russian intelligence officers and demanded an explanation.

Putin appeared to laugh in Wallace’s face as he outlined the charges. When the host tried to hand him the stack of papers, the Russian president would not touch it, indicating that the host could place it on the table between them.

But unlike Trump, Wallace kept pressing him.

The host repeatedly interrupted Putin, asking how his denials can be true when the charges are outlined so specifically in the indictment. Putin, clearly not used to being interrupted when he speaks, grew increasingly agitated and told the host to be “patient,” saying, “let me finish” in several moments.

Make sure you use the proper amount of words, post the right vids, and don't step on the White Folks dicks.
 

Ivan Drago

You Will Lose
Jun 3, 2013
3,903
872
SCOOOOOOTTTLAAAND!


just........................stunningly embarrassing

I cant believe this is the POTUS...........

what the actual fuck

spends a couple of days bashing NATO,goes to russia and gets Putins dick firmly stuck in his orange cockholster as soon as he steps off the plane

'well,Putin said he didndunuffin and so Ill disregard my national security team,the entire USA intelligence community and the special senate investigative committee on the subject'

and we are supposed to trust this buffoon in private closed door meetings with Putin?

ESPECIALLY after the way he got clowned by that bowl cut havin midgit Kim?

the fuckin guy is UNDER INVESTIGATION FOR FUCKING COLLUSION WITH THE RUSSIANS and he demands private meetings with Putin?

its madness
“They said they think it’s Russia; I have President Putin, he just said it’s not Russia,” Trump told reporters. “I will say this: I don’t see any reason why it would be. I have great confidence in my intelligence people, but I will tell you that President Putin was extremely strong and powerful in his denial today.”

The President of Russia being "extremely strong and powerful in his denial" of Russian interference in US elections outweighs (or it at least appears to from these comments) the joint conclusions of the 16 United States governmental agencies which make up the Intelligence Community.
 
Last edited:
Reactions: Bogotazo
Nov 14, 2015
12,730
12,971
Ooh, rare power move; strong alpha pheromones coming from this post.



Leave it to Chris Wallace.

https://www.thedailybeast.com/fox-news-chris-wallace-presses-vladimir-putin-in-tense-interview-after-donald-trump-gives-him-a-pass

After President Donald Trump refused to confront Vladimir Putin over Russia’s direct interference in the 2016 U.S. election, Fox News host Chris Wallace decided to do it for him.

In an exclusive interview with the Russian president that followed his private meeting with Trump and their shocking joint press conference, Wallace literally held up Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s indictment of 12 Russian intelligence officers and demanded an explanation.

Putin appeared to laugh in Wallace’s face as he outlined the charges. When the host tried to hand him the stack of papers, the Russian president would not touch it, indicating that the host could place it on the table between them.

But unlike Trump, Wallace kept pressing him.

The host repeatedly interrupted Putin, asking how his denials can be true when the charges are outlined so specifically in the indictment. Putin, clearly not used to being interrupted when he speaks, grew increasingly agitated and told the host to be “patient,” saying, “let me finish” in several moments.

@Wiirdo's gone all Soviet-style censorship. Taking all the fun out of it. I'm gonna have to start separate threads now to discuss Michelle Obama's cock (have you ever seen a photo of xer pregnant?) and #BankFraudBernie's latest rides.

Wallace interrupting 'cos he knew the answer would'nt be to his liking. Putin bossing it. "Have a closer look at it. Don't scare your population with make-believe threats."

Funny how Wallace didn't raise Putin's claim that $400million was funneled from Russia into Hillary's campaign.
 
Reactions: DBerry and Joe E

Joe E

Proud Shitholer
Jul 29, 2012
22,807
9,301
@Wiirdo's gone all Soviet-style censorship. Taking all the fun out of it. I'm gonna have to start separate threads now to discuss Michelle Obama's cock (have you ever seen a photo of xer pregnant?) and #BankFraudBernie's latest rides.

Wallace interrupting 'cos he knew the answer would'nt be to his liking. Putin bossing it. "Have a closer look at it. Don't scare your population with make-believe threats."

Funny how Wallace didn't raise Putin's claim that $400million was funneled from Russia into Hillary's campaign.
It's all good, Bro. Time will come we'll dominate this thread, too. I hope @Wiirdo realizes before it's too late that he's just stepped in it and will be dragged right down with that deluded, mentalist, freak.
 
Nov 14, 2015
12,730
12,971
“They said they think it’s Russia; I have President Putin, he just said it’s not Russia,” Trump told reporters. “I will say this: I don’t see any reason why it would be. I have great confidence in my intelligence people, but I will tell you that President Putin was extremely strong and powerful in his denial today.”

The President of Russia being "extremely strong and powerful in his denial" of Russian interference in US elections outweighs (or is at least appears to from these comments) the joint conclusions of the 16 United States governmental agencies which make up the Intelligence Community.

 

Joe E

Proud Shitholer
Jul 29, 2012
22,807
9,301
Do you believe Barack Obama over the US Intelligence Community despite the events which have unfolded after these remarks?

And indeed other nation's intelligence organisations?
How could any intelligence agency know who hacked what or if anything was hacked at all when the DNC has refused to turn their servers over to anyone?
 
Reactions: VinoVeritas
Nov 14, 2015
12,730
12,971
Do you believe Barack Obama over the US Intelligence Community despite the events which have unfolded after these remarks?

And indeed other nation's intelligence organisations?
That clip was from October. Barry ordered his cybersecurity chief to stand down in August over Russian cyberwarfare.

The US intelligence community is part of the Deep State. They've long stopped trying to pretend otherwise.

It wasn't 16 intelligence agencies but 3 who concluded Russia tried to interfere in the election. AP's clarification of the numbers. And their conclusion was a joke if the only evidence they had was that which they included in their report.

Did any of the intelligence or law enforcement agencies inspect the DNC server? You'd think that would be the first thing they would do. Instead they relied upon a report by a third party that was contracted by the DNC.
 

Joe E

Proud Shitholer
Jul 29, 2012
22,807
9,301
That clip was from October. Barry ordered his cybersecurity chief to stand down in August over Russian cyberwarfare.

The US intelligence community is part of the Deep State. They've long stopped trying to pretend otherwise.

It wasn't 16 intelligence agencies but 3 who concluded Russia tried to interfere in the election. AP's clarification of the numbers. And their conclusion was a joke if the only evidence they had was that which they included in their report.

Did any of the intelligence or law enforcement agencies inspect the DNC server? You'd think that would be the first thing they would do. Instead they relied upon a report by a third party that was contracted by the DNC.
I put a link to that in our old thread. Did you get it or something similar?
 
Reactions: VinoVeritas

Joe E

Proud Shitholer
Jul 29, 2012
22,807
9,301
Nov 14, 2015
12,730
12,971
I put a link to that in our old thread. Did you get it or something similar?

Yeah Joe I saw that. There wouldn't have been one nation on the planet that didn't have someone trying to get into the DNC server or associated entity after it was shown how retarded they are. Even after the DNC realised Podesta had been phished, they sent out an email with a new password :lol:

Fuck, some anon from 4chan thought he'd try Podesta's p@ssw0rd to get into his twitter
 
Reactions: DBerry and Joe E

Ivan Drago

You Will Lose
Jun 3, 2013
3,903
872
SCOOOOOOTTTLAAAND!
How could any intelligence agency know who hacked what or if anything was hacked at all when the DNC has refused to turn their servers over to anyone?
I'm not a computer expert so I can't answer a question about how exactly they detect hackers.

However numerous cyber security firms have concluded that the hacking orginates from Russia and indeed from government sources.

Here is an article detailing some of the events and how they traced it to an individual within a Russian intelligence organisation.

https://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2018/07/13/world/europe/ap-eu-russia-hackers.html

There is also evidence from inside the Russian government.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2017/06/23/putin-denied-meddling-in-the-u-s-election-the-cia-caught-him-doing-just-that/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.956c77a55e91

The latest revelations center on a critical piece of evidence that led U.S. intelligence agencies to that conclusion. In particular, the CIA had obtained intelligence from sources inside the Russian government by early August that captured the Russian leader’s specific instructions to subordinates on the operation’s objectives: disparage and seek to defeat the Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton while helping to deliver the White House to Trump.

One former CIA official likened the intelligence to the “holy grail,” a rare window directly into the plans and intentions of Putin, a former KGB operative who takes extraordinary precautions to protect himself from foreign surveillance. The intelligence was as raw as it was compelling, and it took other U.S. spy agencies months to reach consensus that Putin not only directed the interference but worked to defeat Clinton, a politician he disliked and suspected of fomenting internal Russian opposition.
 

Joe E

Proud Shitholer
Jul 29, 2012
22,807
9,301
Yeah Joe I saw that. There wouldn't have been one nation on the planet that didn't have someone trying to get into the DNC server or associated entity after it was shown how retarded they are. Even after the DNC realised Podesta had been phished, they sent out an email with a new password :lol:

Fuck, some anon from 4chan thought he'd try Podesta's p@ssw0rd to get into his twitter
Eventually, what will be discovered, IMO, is the reanimated corpse's home server was an intel drop.