Trump: 2020.

Haggis

CHB World Championship People's Champion
May 16, 2013
34,560
11,766
I just said Tulsi wouldn't make it to the top 3. Why did you assume that I think she is? I just like her, and she would probably expose for DNC favorites.
So why are you cheering for a candidate that you admit has no chance to win, to get on stage purely to cripple others and ensure an activist Conservative SCOTUS that will side against you and for big-money corporations and religious fruitcakes in EVERY decision for the next two or three decades?

I like Tulsi too. If she has no path to victory and she's just there to throw shit at the eventual nominee and promote herself, then she can fuck off. :bart

:hat
 
Reactions: Beefcake
Nov 14, 2015
9,393
9,518
So why are you cheering for a candidate that you admit has no chance to win, to get on stage purely to cripple others and ensure an activist Conservative SCOTUS that will side against you and for big-money corporations and religious fruitcakes in EVERY decision for the next two or three decades?

I like Tulsi too. If she has no path to victory and she's just there to throw shit at the eventual nominee and promote herself, then she can fuck off. :bart

:hat

:hat
 
Reactions: Major Pain

Joe E

Proud Shitholer
Jul 29, 2012
18,140
5,731
Thought I read something the other day where Sanders said he would fund abortions and contraceptives in Africa to help reduce climate change. Surely he can't be serious.
Bernie Sanders: Abortion And Population Control Are Important Parts Of Addressing Climate Change
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2019/09/05/bernie_sanders_abortion_and_population_control_are_important_parts_of_addressing_climate_change.html


Conservative writer Liz Wheeler tweeted: "Imagine being so disgusting that you want to force Americans to pay for abortions to kill brown babies in foreign countries so you don't feel guilty flying private jets & visiting communist nations."

CNN host SE Cupp accused Mr Sanders of entertaining the racist ideology of eugenics...:nazi
 
Last edited:

Joe E

Proud Shitholer
Jul 29, 2012
18,140
5,731
I'm Orthodox.

Pretty racist of Bernie don't you think? Singles out Africa (blacks) while ignoring China and India.
Newsletter #28 (Fall 2001)
"Birth Control or Race Control? Sanger and the Negro Project"

https://www.nyu.edu/projects/sanger/articles/bc_or_race_control.php

The Negro Project, instigated in 1939 by Margaret Sanger, was one of the first major undertakings of the new Birth Control Federation of America (BCFA), the product of a merger between the American Birth Control League and Sanger's Birth Control Clinical Research Bureau, and one of the more controversial campaigns of the birth control movement. Developed by white birth control reformers, who consulted with African-Americans for help in promoting the project only well after its inception, the Negro Project and associated campaigns were, nevertheless, widely supported by such black leaders as Mary McLeod Bethune, W. E. B. DuBois, and Rev. Adam Clayton Powell, Jr. Influenced strongly by both the eugenics movement and the progressive welfare programs of the New Deal era, the Negro Project was, from the start, largely indifferent to the needs of the black community and constructed in terms and with perceptions that today smack of racism. :nazi
 
May 10, 2013
2,363
1,076
So why are you cheering for a candidate that you admit has no chance to win, to get on stage purely to cripple others and ensure an activist Conservative SCOTUS that will side against you and for big-money corporations and religious fruitcakes in EVERY decision for the next two or three decades?

I like Tulsi too. If she has no path to victory and she's just there to throw shit at the eventual nominee and promote herself, then she can fuck off. :bart

:hat
Because she is the truth. She can build up her reputation for the next election cycle.

Fuck the eventual nominee if they suck. She's not making up blatant lies, Kamala is a disgusting person and Tulsi exposed that. What's wrong with the truth?

She's not throwing shit at anyone, she's exposing them. Do you think Trump won't expose them if he can? He won't just expose them, he will crush them. I would rather someone like Tulsi attack the candidates and weed them out. You will have a more bulletproof candidate win the nomination and she will also get exposure for a 2024 run.


End of the day, if Tulsi can cripple anyone, then they have zero business running for President.
 

Haggis

CHB World Championship People's Champion
May 16, 2013
34,560
11,766
Because she is the truth. She can build up her reputation for the next election cycle.

Fuck the eventual nominee if they suck. She's not making up blatant lies, Kamala is a disgusting person and Tulsi exposed that. What's wrong with the truth?

She's not throwing shit at anyone, she's exposing them. Do you think Trump won't expose them if he can? He won't just expose them, he will crush them. I would rather someone like Tulsi attack the candidates and weed them out. You will have a more bulletproof candidate win the nomination and she will also get exposure for a 2024 run.


End of the day, if Tulsi can cripple anyone, then they have zero business running for President.
Just go vote for Trump then. Cut out the middleman.

I notice you completely ignore my point about the courts. No surprise. Trump has two appointments already, and RBG is a walking corpse. Follow your ideological purity tantrum, because if you can't get 100% of what you want then you might as well hand the entire country over to corporate shills and religious fundamentalists for the next 30 years, right? :patsch

:hat
 
Dec 7, 2016
3,460
978
56
Just go vote for Trump then. Cut out the middleman.

I notice you completely ignore my point about the courts. No surprise. Trump has two appointments already, and RBG is a walking corpse. Follow your ideological purity tantrum, because if you can't get 100% of what you want then you might as well hand the entire country over to corporate shills and religious fundamentalists for the next 30 years, right? :patsch

:hat

Trump picking the courts is one of the main reasons to vote for Trump. I like RBG and don't want anything to happen to her but I wish she would retire and she should actually be forced to. I would love for Trump to have an appointment right now.
 

Haggis

CHB World Championship People's Champion
May 16, 2013
34,560
11,766
Trump picking the courts is one of the main reasons to vote for Trump. I like RBG and don't want anything to happen to her but I wish she would retire and she should actually be forced to.
Why do you want the courts to be packed with empty-suit lobbyist cunts who will vote against your interests every single time?

:hat
 
Reactions: Beefcake

Joe E

Proud Shitholer
Jul 29, 2012
18,140
5,731
Why do you want the courts to be packed with empty-suit lobbyist cunts who will vote against your interests every single time?

:hat
Why would you support any American candidate that supports the wiping out 30 Million Black persons?
 
Reactions: VinoVeritas
May 10, 2013
2,363
1,076
Just go vote for Trump then. Cut out the middleman.

I notice you completely ignore my point about the courts. No surprise. Trump has two appointments already, and RBG is a walking corpse. Follow your ideological purity tantrum, because if you can't get 100% of what you want then you might as well hand the entire country over to corporate shills and religious fundamentalists for the next 30 years, right? :patsch

:hat
Jesus. It's like you're the one that wants Trump to win.

I can't believe you think that allowing a weak candidate to win the primaries would help best Trump.

If you lived here, I'd say you're part of the problem. But you don't, and you can't vote. So bye.
 

Haggis

CHB World Championship People's Champion
May 16, 2013
34,560
11,766
Jesus. It's like you're the one that wants Trump to win.

I can't believe you think that allowing a weak candidate to win the primaries would help best Trump.

If you lived here, I'd say you're part of the problem. But you don't, and you can't vote. So bye.
You want somebody with no chance to win, to stick around purely to promote herself by damaging others. How about she just works for the Hawaiians who elected her, and then comes back in 4 years or 8 years?

But no - if you dont get 100% your own way, you'll take your ball and go home and hand the entire country over to McConnell and Co.

I like Tulsi as well. But she's not going to win, and there are too many candidates on the stage. She's not even 40 FFS, she has 30 years to get to the Oval Office.

:hat
 
Reactions: Beefcake
May 10, 2013
2,363
1,076
You want somebody with no chance to win, to stick around purely to promote herself by damaging others. How about she just works for the Hawaiians who elected her, and then comes back in 4 years or 8 years?

But no - if you dont get 100% your own way, you'll take your ball and go home and hand the entire country over to McConnell and Co.

I like Tulsi as well. But she's not going to win, and there are too many candidates on the stage. She's not even 40 FFS, she has 30 years to get to the Oval Office.

:hat
I'm sorry. But you're retarded. I feel like I'm talking to the wall. Just please don't reply to me on anything political. I'll do the same. I enjoy your other topics but I'd you keep this up you're going on ignore. The level of political retardation you are displaying is ridiculous. You are literally the worst political poster on this forum. You make the alt right posters in this thread look smart.

Just don't bother talking to me about this stuff anymore or I'll just block you, and I've never blocked anyone before.
 

Joe E

Proud Shitholer
Jul 29, 2012
18,140
5,731
The DNC is a mess. Gabbard is classed with Williamson? The one candidate that may have some crossover appeal, and she's being shafted because she doesn't meet poll requirements? :rofl

https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/at-least-11-candidates-will-make-the-fourth-democratic-debate/

Joe Biden16
Pete Buttigieg16
Kamala Harris16
Bernie Sanders16
Elizabeth Warren16
Cory Booker13
Beto O’Rourke12
Andrew Yang7
Julián Castro6
Amy Klobuchar6
Tom Steyer4
Tulsi Gabbard2
Marianne Williamson1
Michael Bennet0
Steve Bullock0
Bill de Blasio0
John Delaney0
Tim Ryan0
Joe Sestak0
 

Haggis

CHB World Championship People's Champion
May 16, 2013
34,560
11,766
I'm sorry. But you're retarded. I feel like I'm talking to the wall. Just please don't reply to me on anything political. I'll do the same. I enjoy your other topics but I'd you keep this up you're going on ignore. The level of political retardation you are displaying is ridiculous. You are literally the worst political poster on this forum. You make the alt right posters in this thread look smart.

Just don't bother talking to me about this stuff anymore or I'll just block you, and I've never blocked anyone before.
Please explain how Trump winning and stacking the SCOTUS with utter cunts for the next 30 years, is a victory for you.

Tulsi's not going to win. Neither is Mayor Pete, neither is Yang. I like all 3 of them better than I like Biden. If Biden is the best pick to beat Trump and get this actual retard out of the White House, then Biden should be the candidate. Even though I think he's WAY too old and is an Establishment fuckwit. I'll take a Biden win over a Buttigieg loss. Two more SCOTUS picks from Trump and you can forget about anything even vaguely progressive going into law for just about the rest of your adult life. Curse at me and call me stupid all you want, your total refusal to address this is telling.

:hat
 
May 10, 2013
2,363
1,076
Please explain how Trump winning and stacking the SCOTUS with utter cunts for the next 30 years, is a victory for you.

Tulsi's not going to win. Neither is Mayor Pete, neither is Yang. I like all 3 of them better than I like Biden. If Biden is the best pick to beat Trump and get this actual retard out of the White House, then Biden should be the candidate. Even though I think he's WAY too old and is an Establishment fuckwit. I'll take a Biden win over a Buttigieg loss. Two more SCOTUS picks from Trump and you can forget about anything even vaguely progressive going into law for just about the rest of your adult life. Curse at me and call me stupid all you want, your total refusal to address this is telling.

:hat
I said this 10 times. Weeding out the weak candidates by exposing them is a GOOD THING FOR THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY. If Tulsi doesn't do it, then Trump will. How stupid can you be? Do you want me to say it again and again? I'm not cursing you out. I'm just stating a fact, because I've said it so many times and you simply refuse to listen to a different point of view because you are so pigheaded. You are a retard, do not talk to me again.

You're going on on ignore. Goodbye.
 

Joe E

Proud Shitholer
Jul 29, 2012
18,140
5,731
Please explain how Trump winning and stacking the SCOTUS with utter cunts for the next 30 years, is a victory for you.

Tulsi's not going to win. Neither is Mayor Pete, neither is Yang. I like all 3 of them better than I like Biden. If Biden is the best pick to beat Trump and get this actual retard out of the White House, then Biden should be the candidate. Even though I think he's WAY too old and is an Establishment fuckwit. I'll take a Biden win over a Buttigieg loss. Two more SCOTUS picks from Trump and you can forget about anything even vaguely progressive going into law for just about the rest of your adult life. Curse at me and call me stupid all you want, your total refusal to address this is telling.

:hat
I think he told you, Rudder. Biden to old out of one side of your mouth and a Biden win out the other? This:
"The level of political retardation you are displaying is ridiculous"
 
Reactions: Major Pain

Haggis

CHB World Championship People's Champion
May 16, 2013
34,560
11,766
I said this 10 times. Weeding out the weak candidates by exposing them is a GOOD THING FOR THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY. If Tulsi doesn't do it, then Trump will. How stupid can you be? Do you want me to say it again and again? I'm not cursing you out. I'm just stating a fact, because I've said it so many times and you simply refuse to listen to a different point of view because you are so pigheaded. You are a retard, do not talk to me again.

You're going on on ignore. Goodbye.
"Weak candidates" according to YOU and YOUR sensibilities.

I think Biden is a weak candidate. He's fucking ancient, he's been a leading figure in some of the stupidest mistakes of the last 40 years, he's never met a credit card company he won't whore himself off to, and he very well might be experiencing age-related cognitive decline.

He also has 4x the polling support of Tulsi, Pete and Yang combined. That makes him a strong candidate and them weak, no matter what I think about him or who I'd prefer to see win the nomination.

Still running from acknowledging the existence of the SCOTUS, though. That not important to you? Four or five Conservative activists on the SCOTUS isn't a concern to you?

:hat
 
Reactions: tommygun711
May 8, 2013
8,185
3,003
Obama won't endorse his VP because it's a close race and he can't risk burning bridges with the eventual nominee. He's also got a massive ego and is deeply protective of his legacy, supporting someone that can potentially lose, especially one as closely associated with him as Biden, does that.

Do you know the refrain I hear in states like Montana and through the midwest amongst people that are a bit older than us and actively vote/follow politics? It's "I just wish Bernie would go away."
Obama is egotistical enough to believe he has a legacy to protect. After he did everything he could, even some illegal shit, to help Hillary in 2016 who was running as a continuation of the Obama administration, then she LOST to a politically inexperienced Trump, his legacy is non-existent.