Was Michael Jackson an actual predatory pedophile, or just a really weird, really rich, essentially harmless guy with lots of issues?

Was Michael Jackson a fully-fledged predatory pedophile?

  • Disgusting pedo who should have died in jail

  • I wouldn't have sent my kids to Neverland, but he wasn't proved guilty beyond reasonable doubt

  • I think he was probably just a weird rich guy with a lot of issues about childhood


Results are only viewable after voting.

Haggis

CHB World Championship People's Champion
May 16, 2013
31,868
9,803
Seems to me that he was touching up kids for years. But I've never looked too deep into the controversies. Others probably know more about the case. What does CHB say? The most popular predatory pedophile in history, or an essentially harmless but really messed up basket case with a shitload of issues stemming from an abusive childhood?

:hat
 
Jun 4, 2013
20,912
4,070
I don't know, and I lean towards yes. The thing is, though, who the hell would let a little kid (that has no biological relation) sleep with a grown ass adult?
 
Reactions: Joe
Jun 5, 2013
2,584
1,019
I don’t think he was, he was a fucking weirdo surrounded by yes men who had real issues rooting from his own childhood. I just think he he diddled those kids it would have been proven in court, both cases had huge contradictions in them, the first ones Dad clearly had an agenda before it even went to court, he was all about the money, and any parent would want the cunts head on a spike over a settlement, and the second family had actually accused a celebrity before Jackson Im sure and he was warned about them. It just reeks of bullshit.

That’s not to say the guy didn’t need therapy or a hard slap on the face, it was really inappropriate behavoir, after the first case that could have ruined him and surely caused him no end of emotional stress, and the weird cunt goes and invites a load of kids again to be alone in his company.
 
Reactions: Zopilote and Haggis

Davvers

That's a Davvers promise!!!
May 24, 2013
4,087
1,360
The police found child porn in his house and plenty of it. The prosecution minor described a birth mark on his cock and said Wacko Jacko gave him drugs and alcohol and abused him. Them Jacko paid him $22m to settle it. The bloke was a fucking nutter.
 
May 25, 2013
13,183
7,973
Harmless might be a bit of a stretch. Messed up childhood, almost certainly behaved inappropriately around/with the children, I wouldn't have sent my kids there.... but I just don't think he was the vicious pedo he was made out to be by some. Just an eccentric man child who probably enjoys a tickle fight a bit too much.
 
Reactions: Aussie_Al

Pedderrs

DKSAB
Jun 1, 2012
21,834
14,169
29
United Kingdom
The police found child porn in his house and plenty of it.
In fact, a lot of the current information being touted now was leaked then and circulated in the press after the grand jury hearings, prompting a statement to the media from Jackson’s attorney, which was signed off not only by Mesereau but also the prosecution and Judge Melville, fully acknowledging that no child pornography had been found. This was followed up by an official statement from Jackson himself, in which he specifically addressed the information that had been leaked to the media from the grand jury proceedings. It is worth keeping in mind that the grand jury hearings are a process in which the prosecution is able to present their case in its entirety without the benefit of cross examination, and includes the process of discovery whereby all potential evidentiary items are presented and discussed.



The prosecution minor described a birth mark on his cock
Jordan Chandler wrongly stated that MJ was circumcised. He also described a light spot on the penis when there was in fact a dark spot.

I don't think there would have been a settlement out of court if a minor was able to accurately describe Michael Jackson's penis, mate.
 
Reactions: REDC and Primate

Davvers

That's a Davvers promise!!!
May 24, 2013
4,087
1,360
So MJ agreed to pay the kid $22m just for no apparent reason? That's an interesting take. Sounds like he needed a new legal team with expertise that his millions of dollars couldn't afford.
 
Reactions: BobDigi5060
May 17, 2013
8,891
6,461
Louisiana
In fact, a lot of the current information being touted now was leaked then and circulated in the press after the grand jury hearings, prompting a statement to the media from Jackson’s attorney, which was signed off not only by Mesereau but also the prosecution and Judge Melville, fully acknowledging that no child pornography had been found. This was followed up by an official statement from Jackson himself, in which he specifically addressed the information that had been leaked to the media from the grand jury proceedings. It is worth keeping in mind that the grand jury hearings are a process in which the prosecution is able to present their case in its entirety without the benefit of cross examination, and includes the process of discovery whereby all potential evidentiary items are presented and discussed.





Jordan Chandler wrongly stated that MJ was circumcised. He also described a light spot on the penis when there was in fact a dark spot.

I don't think there would have been a settlement out of court if a minor was able to accurately describe Michael Jackson's penis, mate.
I bet the lights were off the next time he fiddled with a kid. That way, no description of his "Johnson/Jackson"