http://dlvr.it/R91zXC
The British Board are a bunch of crooks. Come on WBC, boot him from the rankings the fraud.
The British Board are a bunch of crooks. Come on WBC, boot him from the rankings the fraud.
As ludicrous as it sounds, and it's a fucking joke, I believe that the the A test is only a flag and the B test confirms a failure."The positive test result is believed to have come back on July 17. A knowledgeable source says that it was reported to the Whyte camp (including promoter Matchroom Boxing) and the British Boxing Board of Control by UKAD prior to Whyte-Rivas. However, the BBBC allowed the fight to proceed as scheduled".
So it was known PRIOR to the fight Whyte had tested positive but hushed?
Which raises an interesting question I guess? How many B tests in the history of drug testing have come back with a different result to the A test?As ludicrous as it sounds, and it's a fucking joke, I believe that the the A test is only a flag and the B test confirms a failure.
I don’t know about the semantics, but was under impression from following USADA testing in UFC that the A sample is a confirmed positive and the B sample is taken and held so if the A sample is disputed by the guilty party they can test the B as a confirmation?As ludicrous as it sounds, and it's a fucking joke, I believe that the the A test is only a flag and the B test confirms a failure.
Cus of the joke of an outcome, I gave up reading on it, but it was actually reported that Tyson Fury's B test came back negative.Which raises an interesting question I guess? How many B tests in the history of drug testing have come back with a different result to the A test?
Not very many in my memory.
Secondary question though, I wonder what Whyte has tested positive to? It could be a recreational banned drug.
I don’t recall any?Which raises an interesting question I guess? How many B tests in the history of drug testing have come back with a different result to the A test?
Not very many in my memory.
Secondary question though, I wonder what Whyte has tested positive to? It could be a recreational banned drug.
I'm genuinely not sure buddy.I don’t know about the semantics, but was under impression from following USADA testing in UFC that the A sample is a confirmed positive and the B sample is taken and held so if the A sample is disputed by the guilty party they can test the B as a confirmation?
Like if he admitted it (he won’t), they don’t then test the B?
If it is a positive for a recreational drug I guess we can cut them some slack.I don’t recall any?
That’s a good shout on the recreational. Another thought I had was to rehab an injury? As physically he looked dog shit for him.
Deflection? To cause a distraction from impending news?Why did Hearn randomly start mentioning Manny at the weekend? a fighter he's never slagged off before, especially pointing the finger like @DB Cooper said.