He is free now. He did leave but board made there decision.Isn't this old news? I thought he'd left Warren several months ago - And,has he not already been in a fight for Matchroom?
think there is something in managment contract law which states if you have lost all trust in your managment you can terminate the contract. pretty sure there was strong evidence in terms of not getting paid on time etc too.Good news for Tony, but he might find a Clev rematch is less likely
Could someone in the know please explain the process & how Tony was able to walk away from Frank whilst still under contract (?) & what this means for other fighters who may also be unhappy with their present situation
Mando's don't mean shit in reality.think there is something in managment contract law which states if you have lost all trust in your managment you can terminate the contract. pretty sure there was strong evidence in terms of not getting paid on time etc too.
Miranda is a good start. Get Tony some of these international straps and start working his way up the rankings. if he wants Cleverly, become his mandatory.
The position at law following the decision of the Court of Appeal in the case of Warren v Mendy [1989] 1 WLR 853 is that in practice any boxer can simply walk away from any management or promotional agreement and the Courts cannot compel him to continue with the contract. This is because boxing involves a special skill or talent which could be seriously affected and could possibly put the boxer at risk if he was compelled to continue to work for a man who he detested or had lost all trust and confidence in. It does not apply to normal commercial contracts.Good news for Tony, but he might find a Clev rematch is less likely
Could someone in the know please explain the process & how Tony was able to walk away from Frank whilst still under contract (?) & what this means for other fighters who may also be unhappy with their present situation
Degale out until May next year then. :-(Chunky has done this.
He appeared before the Board on the 18th. July represented by Ian Mill Q.C. The Board ordered that he did not have to continue with the contract with the Bunny, not that the Board had any choice in the matter as they cannot overule the Court of Appeal, but that he had to pay the Bunny 25% of any purse monies which he received until April 2013, when his contract would have expired.
Thankyou for your response, Ive had a quick read of Warren v Mendy & understand the bare basics (I think)The position at law following the decision of the Court of Appeal in the case of Warren v Mendy [1989] 1 WLR 853 is that in practice any boxer can simply walk away from any management or promotional agreement and the Courts cannot compel him to continue with the contract. This is because boxing involves a special skill or talent which could be seriously affected and could possibly put the boxer at risk if he was compelled to continue to work for a man who he detested or had lost all trust and confidence in. It does not apply to normal commercial contracts.
However, if the boxer does not have solid contractual grounds which would allow him to determine any normal contract then, although the boxer cannot be ordered to continue with the contract, that is the Court cannot make an order of "Specific Performance", the boxer may be ordered to compensate the ex-manager or promoter for any financial loss that they will sustain as a consequence of the boxer no longer being under contract to them. Usually 25% of any purse monies until the date that the contract would have ended. See the decision of the Board in James DeGale's case.
In Tony's case I was able to convince the Board that we had more than adequate grounds for determining the contract given the numerous breaches of both the contractual terms and the Board's own Rules and Regulations by the manager. The Board have determined that the management contract was legitimately determined and that Tony does not have to pay his ex-manager a single penny by way of commission for any future fights. Read the case of Warren v Mendy and if you have any problems, contact me.
I hope that this helps.
I have stated the reason in the post above.Rumpole. How comes DeGale has to pay 25% and Bellew doesn't?
Theres plenty of other fighters that would like to leave.