Bradley could have won round 1, it was pretty even that round.I had it even. I didn't give Bradley a round from 1-6 and gave him the benefit of the doubt in 7 and 8 and gave him every round clearly after that. I'll watch tomorrow when I'm not just giving Bradley rounds because he recovered from his beating in the first round, maybe he didn't come back storming as much as I thought.
No way you can give him 7 rounds though, absolutely no way.
Like I said, I'll have to give it a rewatch tomorrow, maybe I'm wrong but I just don't see 7 rounds for Bradley.Bradley could have won round 1, it was pretty even that round.
Not directly but defo been coming for some time. I have him 1-2 against JMM myself and whilst the Bradley fight was a robbery I cannot be help smile because I hated the way JMM was robbed in the third fight.Hardly justice for anyone concerned.
That sort of reasoning bothers me too, man. It's not Manny's fault the judges jobbed Marquez, no more than it's Timmy's fault Manny got jobbed. It doesn't give Marquez a win, so it hardly balances things out. Bradley has a win over an ATG that (judging by the accounts on here and elsewhere) he didn't earn. I still need to watch the fight before I slam the decision outright.Didn't score it, but Pacquiao won a comfortable decision IMO.
I've seen people on the other forum celebrating this decision as somewhat deserved after many thought Marquez beat Pacquiao last time out. I personally had Marquez beating Pacquiao in their third bout, but that doesn't "even" the decisions out, so to speak. Some more bullshit in boxing. :conf