Boxing Forums banner

Does the "traditional" route damage our fighters?

1976 Views 21 Replies 7 Participants Last post by  Avidlemon
does taking the route of english/commonweatlh/british/euro level take too long and deny some fighters some valuable experience of taking part in contests against different styles of fighters? Because let's face it, as good as the british scene is, there aren't too many different styles to come up against. Groves going to fight in america a couple of times is a good example of someone getting a different angle and experience of different styles. Or does going the traditional route give fighters time to find out who they are as a fighter and what their strengths are before making a step up?

I've never been able to decide. But you hear a lot of pro's saying they prefer the traditional route if they can take it.

Does taking the traditional route really prepare our fighters for the best is what i suppose i'm really asking?
21 - 22 of 22 Posts
Surely though the problem with the alphabet soup is that picking the "right" opponents does fighters a diservice in the sense that they do not help them prepare for the higher classes?
I agree if there getting poor opponents picked for them, then there likely going to be serious trouble when they get to the world stage, and i always think that if a promoter matches them very carefully he cant have a great deal of faith in there abilities, they just sell tickets and make money.
I agree if there getting poor opponents picked for them, then there likely going to be serious trouble when they get to the world stage, and i always think that if a promoter matches them very carefully he cant have a great deal of faith in there abilities, they just sell tickets and make money.
I think this is almost ALWAYS the case....Think Nathan Cleverly! Teak tough africans and a Murat!
21 - 22 of 22 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top