10? Could you? Or would you be reduced to the ridiculous situation of calling fights like Joshua-Savon a farce where where due to the vagaries of the amateur scoring system a close fight went against what a lot of people, most of whom have never scored an amateur fight in their life and didn't even come up with any concrete numbers for the fight themselves, thought?
Either way, to call the tournment as a whole "a farce" is way out of line IMHO as you've pretty much admitted in a previous post. As a British boxing fan theres absolutely no need to start wearing the hair shirt over this Olympic boxing tournament but, then again, I guess us Brits love a good moan.
But that fight wasn't close and reeked of hometown cooking. I've watched the fight three times and had Savon at least six points ahead and winning every single round. On top of that we have had the aforementioned fight that saw six knockdown's ignored and the round called even. A DQ for leading with the head, so poor a DQ even the Cuban opponent looked bemused by the situation.
We had Attoev V Juratoni whereby Attoev was hurt in the second round and from that moment onwards he ran, cuddled and blew out of his arse. he hardly threw a punch back, certainly none that landed whilst the Turk landed frequently only to lose the third round and I think the second was a draw. Then there was the Spence robbery that they had to overturn (the second of the tournament). A knockout was scored after the bell in gausher's first fight, the scoring punch didn't even beat the bell.
There has been four officials sent home under investigation of corruption, another suspended for poor practice. That's just off my head and that doesn't include other matches that weren't close in the first round and scored the other way.
Just because something is a farce doesn't mean you can't enjoy it either, it just means it isn't ran to level it should be and that unexpected and questionable events turn up along the way. in fact a farce is actually meant to be enjoyed.