Boxing Forums banner
1 - 14 of 14 Posts

· Diamond Dog
Joined
·
8,341 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
This is interesting, it is form the Miami News, 1925. The opinion of this writer is that Greb is one of the greatest fighters that ever lived, but hasn't caught Fitz or Ketchel at the weight most modern observers seem to view as his best. This has become my way of thinking also. But I think this article also seems to indicate that these two are ranked higher p4p than Greb also?

There's other cool stuff, Ketchel-Johnson and Ketchel-Langford regarded as a fix, the huge regard for Ketchel's mw competition (I agree with this too) and Demspey's possible duck of Greb.

Anyway, here are some highlights:

"Greb must surely be listed as one of the truly great middleweights. His record at this poundage is below that of Bob Fitzsimmons. It is not quite so sensational as that of Stanley Ketchel. Yet it is but a little below either of those when al-around performances are considered.

Fitzsimmons stands alone. He was sometimes scarcely more than a middle, as the type is scaled today, when he whipped the best heavyweights of his period, bar one - Jeffries. And Fitz scaled but 168 in the last memorable battle between the two. That is but eight pounds more than Harry Greb weighted when he recently thrashed MIckey Walker.

Let it be added that Fiz whipped one of the greatest middleweight champins when he stopped Jack Dempsey, the nonpareil, in 13 rounds. Dempsey was on the down grade, 'tis true. But few who witnessed the Cornishman's display doubted he would have taken the wonderful Dempsey even in the latter's prime.

Undoubtedly second place must be afforded to Stanley Ketchel. This picturesque ring type defeated more talented middleweights than has Harry Greb, on reason being there were more of this brand to be found a few years back.

Greb excepting Jack Dillon and Bob Moha has never been called upon to face such as Joe Tomas, Billy Papke, Willlie Lewis, Hugo Kelly, Tony Caponi, Frank Klaus, Mike Sulivan - that is as middleweights. Nor has he turned in a performance quite as impressive as Ketchel's famous KO of Jack O'Brien.

Greb has shown more brilliantly against the heavies than did Ketchel. Ketchel fought but two realy big men - Jack Johnson and Sam Langford. And these may well be scratched for neither was strictly "on the level." Johnson admitted his affair with Ketchel was a "Frame."

As has been said, Greb did better against the big men than Ketchel. And while little more than a middleweight, he has been amazingly successful. He has whipped Tom Gibbons, Billy Miske, Bill Brennan, Willie Meehan, Bat Levinsky, Gunboat Smith, Charley Weinert, Bartley Madden and Gene Tunney.

Fitzsimmons alone has excelled Harry Greb's achievements in te matter of winning from bigger, stronger fellows. And Greb resembles Fitz in another way. Fitz fought and whipped a heavyweight champion (Corbett) for the championship. Greb was wiling to essay such a task but was never accorded the opportunity. He repeatedly challenged Dempsey, but the latter passed the offer up...Willie Meehan twicce obtained decisions over Dempsey in four round bouts. Meehan was a clown though Dempsey never saw anything funny about him. Meehan was too much of a puzzle to afford any good humour to Jack.

Greb's style would have been just the tactics to confuse Dempsey. Harry's is the most unregulation technique the ring has ever witnessed. He shoots blows from any and all angles.

Greb is one of the real marvels of the ring. No doubt about that."
 

· Registered
Joined
·
3,168 Posts
Seems he's saying Fitz is higher P4P and Ketchell beat beater men at middleweight? Is the timing of article relevant where appreciation of Greb might be higher if it was written 10-20 years later rather than towards the end of his career?
 

· Diamond Dog
Joined
·
8,341 Posts
Discussion Starter · #3 ·
I dunno. I mean you'd need to know what it was that the guy thought about the thing in 15 years time, and I don't know that...it's true that guys are normally more highly regarded by the majority a decade after their retirement, but you can't really apply it on a case by case basis. I wish I could read other opinions like this of Greb through the 20's and 30's but i haven't really found any.
 

· Forum Co-owner
Joined
·
4,231 Posts
The thing that amazes me about greb is everyone bangs on about him being the best middleweight ever but his wins at the heavier weight are excellent just as ray Robinson is rated highly at welter and middle so must greb be at middleweight and lightheavyweight which also asks another question how far is greb behind Robinson in the greatest ever stakes
 

· Registered
Joined
·
22,444 Posts
I don't think you can rank Greb top without seeing him fight, unfortunately. his resume is second to none so he will always be a contender for the throne but I think the lack of footage seriously takes something away from him. A lot of Rays best stuff doesn't have footage either but at least we can see him fight a fair bit and see what skills etc he has. With Greb we just rely on reporters from the time for everything.

Such a shame really as his record is superb.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
22,444 Posts
Robinsons ducking of Burley has been blew ridiculously out of proportion. Burley brought nothing to the table, it was as simple as that, he brought to money, no major prestige, didn't have a title and they never really boxed in the same weight division.

Burley was just in a bad position to really force fights on anyone, he just seemed to be in the wrong place at the wrong time.
 

· Forum Co-owner
Joined
·
4,231 Posts
Robinsons ducking of Burley has been blew ridiculously out of proportion. Burley brought nothing to the table, it was as simple as that, he brought to money, no major prestige, didn't have a title and they never really boxed in the same weight division.

Burley was just in a bad position to really force fights on anyone, he just seemed to be in the wrong place at the wrong time.
Ray arcel was pretty sure that Robinson himself wanted no part of burley and if arcel says it that's good enough for me
 

· God's Country
Joined
·
6,297 Posts
I don't think you can rank Greb top without seeing him fight, unfortunately. his resume is second to none so he will always be a contender for the throne but I think the lack of footage seriously takes something away from him. A lot of Rays best stuff doesn't have footage either but at least we can see him fight a fair bit and see what skills etc he has. With Greb we just rely on reporters from the time for everything.

Such a shame really as his record is superb.
I don't see how this holds up against the fact that we get to see the skills of men he did defeat on film. The result must prove the point, as far as I'm concerned. If the resume is there, we have no reason to doubt the ability to build that resume. It's done. The tests were passed.
 

· CHB Overlord
Joined
·
26,241 Posts
Take the test
 
1 - 14 of 14 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top