Great quality video and what it clearly demonstrates is how slow Carnera was and how limited his skills were.
High Quality Primo Carnera fight footage
The good quality gives it a modern feel in spite of the black and white.
1 - 17 of 17 Posts
Great quality video and what it clearly demonstrates is how slow Carnera was and how limited his skills were.
His biggest asset was the fact he was freakishly big for a man at that time when it came to boxing. BoxRec has him at 6 ft. 5 1/2 in. tall and he fought around 260 and up. That was Klitschko before Klitschko.
Definitely not a speed demon but honestly I think his skills aren't bad.Great quality video and what it clearly demonstrates is how slow Carnera was and how limited his skills were.
Compare him to someone like Ty Fields from a few years back and I think he looks like a giant Mayweather...lol
We have gotten spoiled in the modern area as bigger guys have become more common...and hence it's more possible to find huge guys who are fluid, fast and skilled. Having said that...most big guys aren't Tyson Fury, or Lennox Lewis, or the Klitschkos or Bowe for the brief period he was fantastic.
Does he look much worse or much slower than these two?
Does he look much worse or much slower than these two?
Well that always showed good the whole era looks like novices compared to the average 70s fighterGreat quality video and what it clearly demonstrates is how slow Carnera was and how limited his skills were.
Yea he looks horrible silly questionWe have gotten spoiled in the modern area as bigger guys have become more common...and hence it's more possible to find huge guys who are fluid, fast and skilled. Having said that...most big guys aren't Tyson Fury, or Lennox Lewis, or the Klitschkos or Bowe for the brief period he was fantastic.
Does he look much worse or much slower than these two?
Worse than Tye Fields? Or Michael Grant? Or David Price? Or Tony Thompson?Yea he looks horrible silly question
Eh I don't think he looks worse than those guys at all.
George Foreman looked more wild than anyone.Well that always showed good the whole era looks like novices compared to the average 70s fighter
And Joe Louis still looks sharper on film than anyone before or since.
Not in full rounds joe doesn't so lie he looked like his era a novice compared to the average 70s fighterGeorge Foreman looked more wild than anyone.
And Joe Louis still looks sharper on film than anyone before or since.
you think which means no video shows that in full rounds whichWorse than Tye Fields? Or Michael Grant? Or David Price? Or Tony Thompson?
Eh I don't think he looks worse than those guys at all.
means your mind is messed
up,nobody who seen either in full rounds would say such a idiotic/weird thing
in full rounds shows all those guys are way more advanced and fluid than that whole novice era
Did you ever watch Tye Fields? Lolyou think which means no video shows that in full rounds which
means your mind is messed
up,nobody who seen either in full rounds would say such a idiotic/weird thing
in full rounds shows all those guys are way more advanced and fluid than that whole novice era
Jess Willard and Primo Carnera looked like Giant Sugar Ray Leonard's compared to that trash bag.
So you think Joe Louis looked more "novice" then George Foreman.Not in full rounds joe doesn't so lie he looked like his era a novice compared to the average 70s fighter
I don't think anything full rounds shows joe was horrible compared, all the big men he fought would all be destroyed by ali,Norton,frazier 1st round these are how much more advanced and fluid they wereSo you think Joe Louis looked more "novice" then George Foreman.
and Tye was sloopy but way more advanced and fluid than those trash guys so you never even seen any of these guys or just trolling cause nobody in their right mind would be saying this idiotic stuff,oh you watch highlights/books/read quotes you're a kid who believes in fiction I don't,I only care about video in full rounds, so unless you can produce the fiction version of those novices nothing you say matters.....
Trying to read your text and make sense of it is causing me to picture you as this guy:I don't think anything full rounds shows joe was horrible compared, all the big men he fought would all be destroyed by ali,Norton,frazier 1st round these are how much more advanced and fluid they were
and Tye was sloopy but way more advanced and fluid than those trash guys so you never even seen any of these guys or just trolling cause nobody in their right mind would be saying this idiotic stuff,oh you watch highlights/books/read quotes you're a kid who believes in fiction I don't,I only care about video in full rounds, so unless you can produce the fiction version of those novices nothing you say matters.....
do you have video from full rounds of primo being as more advanced and fluid with less flaws yes or no?Trying to read your text and make sense of it is causing me to picture you as this guy:
Actually I could've exposed you with my first response back to you, I just was wondering how much you would keep lying and exposing yourself ,of not watching full rounds which you did a good job of that...
Wouldn't want be a ref having to move around in a suit and bowtie for 15 rounds.The good quality gives it a modern feel in spite of the black and white.
1 - 17 of 17 Posts
Boxing Forums
A forum community dedicated to Boxing fans and enthusiasts. Come join the discussion about weigh-ins, matches, rankings, fighting styles, training, live fights, reviews, and more!
Full Forum Listing
Explore Our Forums
Top Contributors this Month
View All
SwollenGoat
217 Replies
steviebruno
94 Replies
Broxi
91 Replies
Recommended Communities
