G
Guest
·Had Ward taken on Bute and then won a belt at 175. While Dawson rematches Pascal and picks up another title???
This.Exactly the same.
I think theres allot more options for Dawson if we wins than Ward.It would have been a lot bigger if they'd both won those fights, and at 175 it's just a better fight. No reason to have it at 168. If Ward wins he will have to move up as unless Dirrell suddenly becomes relevant again there is nothing for him. If Dawson somehow wins the only fight for him at 68 is Froch.
Is there much skill on show here? Define skill in a boxing sense, ward is messy and will maul his way to a points win never shaking Dawson, whilst Dawson throws 4 punches per roundI wonder how big it could've been if boxing fans cared about watching skill over uneducated, no-ducking, no blocking, no lateral movement aggression.
:nono Technical skills can be great to watch but they need to be matched right also. Having two guys who are never in exciting fights and have no personalities is always going to be a poor seller. I mean everyone expected Ward to beat Froch (most anyway) but at least there was a chance that Froch could draw him into a fight and make it exciting.I wonder how big it could've been if boxing fans cared about watching skill over uneducated, no-ducking, no blocking, no lateral movement aggression.
There's a difference between skills and styles, too often people think being an outboxer or counterpuncher is more skillful than infighting, which is not true:nono Technical skills can be great to watch but they need to be matched right also. Having two guys who are never in exciting fights and have no personalities is always going to be a poor seller. I mean everyone expected Ward to beat Froch (most anyway) but at least there was a chance that Froch could draw him into a fight and make it exciting.
Of course maybes there styles will contradict the expectations and gel but most likely it'll be a dull affair with Ward cagily outboxing Dawson in a fight that sees more posturing than punches thrown.
Are you saying neither have been in exciting fights? I find Ward's performances to often be exciting, but they're not competitive enough for most. That I can understand. Now, to suggest that Dawson was never in an exciting fight, no offence, is simply ridiculous, to anyone who has ever seen at least Dawson/Johnson I. That was a dogfight, through and through, no ifs, no ands and no buts, mate. So, save your no-no emoticon. Harumph. And the Pascal fight had plenty of action also. But, whatever.:nono Technical skills can be great to watch but they need to be matched right also. Having two guys who are never in exciting fights and have no personalities is always going to be a poor seller. I mean everyone expected Ward to beat Froch (most anyway) but at least there was a chance that Froch could draw him into a fight and make it exciting. Of course maybes there styles will contradict the expectations and gel but most likely it'll be a dull affair with Ward cagily outboxing Dawson in a fight that sees more posturing than punches thrown.
If you don't think they're both skilled operators or that skills will most likely be on display in a fight like this, I am truly beside myself as to what you think skill actually is.Is there much skill on show here? Define skill in a boxing sense, ward is messy and will maul his way to a points win never shaking Dawson, whilst Dawson throws 4 punches per round
Are they any more skilled than other world level fighters? Maybe but tyson versus bowel would have been a great display of skill and would have been a totally different fight, ward is good at negating and has skills, but JMM is equally skilled imoAre you saying neither have been in exciting fights? I find Ward's performances to often be exciting, but they're not competitive enough for most. That I can understand. Now, to suggest that Dawson was never in an exciting fight, no offence, is simply ridiculous, to anyone who has ever seen at least Dawson/Johnson I. That was a dogfight, through and through, no ifs, no ands and no buts, mate. So, save your no-no emoticon. Harumph. And the Pascal fight had plenty of action also. But, whatever. If you don't think they're both skilled operators or that skills will most likely be on display in a fight like this, I am truly beside myself as to what you think skill actually is.
For Dawson I would say 6 of his last 8 have been extremely boring - well lets say 7 and discount Hopkins 1 because it never really got going.Are you saying neither have been in exciting fights? I find Ward's performances to often be exciting, but they're not competitive enough for most. That I can understand. Now, to suggest that Dawson was never in an exciting fight, no offence, is simply ridiculous, to anyone who has ever seen at least Dawson/Johnson I. That was a dogfight, through and through, no ifs, no ands and no buts, mate. So, save your no-no emoticon. Harumph. And the Pascal fight had plenty of action also. But, whatever. If you don't think they're both skilled operators or that skills will most likely be on display in a fight like this, I am truly beside myself as to what you think skill actually is.
And is hardly Mr Aggression either. He'll find a way inside and sit on Dawson's chest. Shit, when even Glen Johnson stops Alan Green, you need to rethink your style.Dawson is low output.
Ward stops guys getting shots off.
Forgive me for not being excited.