Boxing Forums banner
1 - 20 of 28 Posts

· Registered
Joined
·
6,403 Posts
Yeah I see your little pop at them on twitter Flea :lol:

While I don't rate Mike Jones, Bailey's win over him should probably be rated higher than Brook's win over Carlson Jones
 
G

·
ring rankings are horrific.

My top 15 at Welterweight.

Welterweight (147lbs)
World Championship: (Vacant)
1. Manny Pacquiao
2. Timothy Bradley (WBO)
3. Devon Alexander
4. Paulie Mallignaggi (WBA)
5. Randall Bailey (IBF)
6. Victor Ortiz
7. Kell Brook
8. Jan Zaveck
9. Selcuk Aydin
10. Ionut Dan Ion
11. Mike Jones
12. Vyacheslav Senchenko
13. Ismael El Massoudi
14. Carson Jones
15. Jesse Vargas
 

· Registered
Joined
·
17,509 Posts
where did it move to.
I moved the thread to the World forum, rather than the British one. Because this site is new, we need to get the world forum as active as possible to try to attract new people and this is a worldwide topic, even though it involves a Brit. :good

FYI Khan vs Garcia is for the ring title!!
:lol:
 

· wow very uch rilm
Joined
·
10,590 Posts
I moved the thread to the World forum, rather than the British one. Because this site is new, we need to get the world forum as active as possible to try to attract new people and this is a worldwide topic, even though it involves a Brit. :good

:lol:
@Roe being his usual self and cock blocking the British posters. No one gives a shit about the world forum mate, deal with it.


On Kell Brook, no way does he deserve to be that high, but I'd expect nothing else from the Ring's rankings. Might as well use BoxRec.
 

· Umberto Eco Subscribes
Joined
·
7,466 Posts
Roe>>>>>>

Should Bailey be higher than Brook though? I agree that having Brook at number 3 is a bit steep, but is Bailey's recent run better than Brook's is? Since he's moved up to 147 his only wins of note have been against Jones and Bonsu(and it's kind of a stretch including him as a win of ''note'', though I suppose you could almost count Ouali as a W rather than an NC), whereas Brook has Jones, Jackiewicz, and I'd say you could call Hatton and maybe N'Dou as better wins than Bonsu.

I like Bailey a lot, but he's really not that good anyways.:yep I can see the argument if you rate the win over Jones higher than I do though. If you consider that win on it's own to be better than Brook's 2/3 good wins then I suppose it's fair. It's not clear-cut though, in my opinion.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
22,444 Posts
Pacquaio, Bradley, Malignaggi, Bailey, Ortiz, Lopez, Alexander, van heerden have all done more than him at the weight imo. Not that they are all better but Brook hasn't really fought anyone on the world scene to warrant that sort of ranking yet. And I haven't even ranked Floyd either as his last fight was LMW.

Ring are shit though, become a right joke ever since Oscar took over and get worse and worse each year. Fuck sturm and Abraham top 10 middleweights of all time.
 

· Umberto Eco Subscribes
Joined
·
7,466 Posts
@Pabby simple for me. He beat a higher ranked fighter in his recent fight.
That's fair, then again I think a lot of people had Jackiewicz ahead of Jones prior to Brook beating him. I just think his body of work at 147 > Bailey's I guess. I can see and respect the argument people can/will make in Bailey's favour though.
 
1 - 20 of 28 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top