Boxing Forums banner
1 - 20 of 73 Posts

· Villan
Joined
·
12,455 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
Old point, I know, but seen this posted about tonight. Anyway:

"In a statement, the IBF said its decision to let Peterson keep the title "is based on the findings reported by an independent physician, certified in internal medicine and endocrinology, retained by the IBF to review Peterson's medical records in relation to the information disclosed in the VADA report released this past May."

During the negotiations for the rematch, Peterson had asked Khan to accept random blood and urine testing conducted by VADA, and Khan accepted. Yet it was Peterson who failed a drug test, forcing the fight to be canceled and putting his career in limbo.

According to the IBF's statement, its independent doctor was asked "to provide an opinion as to whether the levels of testosterone noted in the VADA report appeared to be consistent with the therapeutic use of the hormone, or for performance-enhancing purposes.

Additionally, the physician was asked whether these levels of testosterone would have enhanced Lamont Peterson's training for, and performance during, the bout on Dec. 10, 2011, and for his training for the bout scheduled for May 19, 2012.

"After concluding the review of all the documentation provided by Peterson's camp and the Nevada State Athletic Commission, the physician determined that the testosterone levels noted in the VADA report are consistent with the therapeutic use of the hormone and not for the purpose of performance enhancement.

"Therefore, these levels would not have enhanced Lamont Peterson's training for or performance during the bout on Dec. 10, 2011, nor for his training for the bout that was scheduled for May 19, 2012, as a specimen collected by VADA on April 13, 2012 tested negative on May 2, 2012."

http://espn.go.com/boxing/story/_/id/8255582/ibf-rules-lamont-peterson-keep-junior-welterweight-belt

Peterson's only crime was failing to disclose his usage. :deal
 

· Registered
Joined
·
6,670 Posts
Drugs or no drugs Peterson would of won that fight, that pressure was too much Khan aint no testosterone gonna boost stamina like that, plus its now been confirmed hes clean which was obvious anyway.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
837 Posts
What's changed since the first fight?
Practise at pressure weakness he has, he was winning on my card without the deductions so if he doesn't foul and boxes better on the inside when he's not on his favoured range area.

I rate Khan, I simply think he's flawed defensively and instinctively. I think Petersons inactivity is a plus too.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
1,775 Posts
No not really, his levels wernt even elevated that high all its gonna do is allow you to recover from training that bit quicker it doesnt give you super stamina and capability to walk through punches mate.

In summary go fuck your mother.
herp derp

No one is saying it turned him into superman. That is your own retarded strawman argument. The point is it was a fight decided by one or two rounds and any advantage is telling and Peterson got an advantage with testosterone.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
22,444 Posts
His reasons were legit but to be fair he should have told the board before the fight so therefore he gave himself a bad rep by being an idiot. I actually scored the fight in favour of Khan so i son't think it mattered anyway and I see a second being similarly close.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
466 Posts
Thread titled 'Lamont Peterson did not cheat'. lol the guy had test pellets in his groin. Quite simply the guys a steroid cheat. Anyone who swallows a shred of Lamonts concocted BS cover up story is very gullible.

Ive got a mate who takes test, it certainly isn't because his test levels are low. It is for one reason and one reason only, to gain an advantage in his training.
 

· Villan
Joined
·
12,455 Posts
Discussion Starter · #20 ·
Thread titled 'Lamont Peterson did not cheat'. lol the guy had test pellets in his groin. Quite simply the guys a steroid cheat. Anyone who swallows a shred of Lamonts concocted BS cover up story is very gullible.

Ive got a mate who takes test, it certainly isn't because his test levels are low. It is for one reason and one reason only, to gain an advantage in his training.
Did you actually read the article?

I'll take a physicians opinion over your mate's at the gym.
 
1 - 20 of 73 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top