[Chatty]

Was having a discussion about this with Ben Doughty and a few others on his page yesterday. Due to the cluster-fuck of a case, we will probably never no the real outcome and also because of this and the fact they could not gather substantial evidence then it is probably correct that he was freed. but for those of you that have studied the case what are you thoughts on his guilt or innocence.

Evidence against:

2 witnesses identified the vehicle him and Artis were picked up in
He admittedly went searching for guns before the incident
Live rounds were found in the vehicle that matched the murder weapon
Witness identified Carter (good possibility of ulterior motives)
One of the victims gave an e-fit of Artis
carter was in the area (in a nearby bar)
Possible motive in racial reaction to his friends father being killed by a white-man earlier that night
Survivor identified Carter to brother.

Carter was never proved innocence but rather let go due to the case being based on a racist witch-hunt from local police as well as some suspicious witnesses etc.

Carter apparently had some major beef with some of the local police that had them pursuing him and looking to pin stuff on him whenever possible.

 

[w;dkm ckeqfjq c]

Probably

 

[Wallet]

Here he is with fellow man of integrity, Jose Sulaiman:

@Boxed Ears

 

[Michael]

He could very well be guilty, would make a right cunt out of that film of him with big Denzel in it:yep

 

[GazOC]

Probably guilty and he didn't beat Giardello either.:deal

 

[Chatty]

Probably guilty and he didn't beat Giardello either.:deal

Yeah that came up as well in the debate, apparently Giardello sued them after the film and won as well. Good man.

TBF the whole film is a bit pile of shit, full of inaccuracies and made up events.

 

[GazOC]

IIRC Giardello ended up forcing a mention at the end of the film stating the fight might not have been accuratly depicted. Denzil seemed to be really into the "worthy" movies around that point in his career and Carter certainly fitted the bill.

 

[Chatty]

Someone mentioned that Denzel came to the conclusion that Carter did it as well. I haven't heard that one before but I would be interested to hear why he believes this (if it is indeed true)

 

[084]

Guilty, he should have hung for his crimes

 

[Slip]

Innocent.

 

[Boxed Ears]

Here he is with fellow man of integrity, Jose Sulaiman:

@Boxed Ears

Awwww, look at 'im. You can tell, he's just wondering 'How deep can Rubsy go into my flabby, stinky, rotting, yeasty vagina?'

 

[Wiirdo]

From everything I've read about the case, it seems very likely he did it.

 

[w;dkm ckeqfjq c]

He did it. But he was just too slick for the courts. Too black.

 

[Klompton]

Guilty as sin:

http://graphicwitness.com/carter/index.html

http://www.martinlutherking.org/hurricane1.html

This was just one of those celebrity causes that a lot of people who should have known better got involved in and jumped on the bandwagon. This dirty SOB is guilty and should have spent his life behind bars. Was, is, and will always be a sociopathic con man with a chip on his shoulder and an entitlement complex.

 

[KO KIDD (ESB EX-Patriot)]

Guilty

 

[O59]

Don't know enough about the case to form an opinion, but the film was a crock of fucking shit from what I've read. Totally inaccurate. Still a very good film, just full of lies.

 

[Sweethome_Bama]

He probably did do it, that said the state was wrong because they presented a shitty case.
They have to prove guilt, the defendant doesn't have to prove innocence.
Sad part is if they handled shit properly a murderer would be in jail.

 

[The Sweet Science]

Probably guilty and he didn't beat Giardello either.:deal

That is right! I love that movie as Denzel is one of my favorites, but let's face it. The movie is fiction.

 

[The Sweet Science]

Giardello beat Carter fair and square. I am glad he sued the people who made the movie.

 

[No Fear]

Is it true that Bob Dylan stopped playing the song 'Hurricane' because he no longer believed in Carter's innocence?