Why exactly? He doesn't owe Steward anything - he paid him to be his trainer.
Why exactly? He doesn't owe Steward anything - he paid him to be his trainer.Doing what? Wearing Kronk style shorts?
From a cynical viewpoint Wlad should pay to keep it open as a tribute, he'd get major kudos from the US. Actually he should do this anyway IMO
It wasn't intended to be condescending, it was a genuine question. You could ask why Hearns, or Lewis, or Cotto haven't put the money up. All had strong relationships with Steward (even though Miguel's was very short-lived professionally).To improve his reputation in the US.
I'm aware he paid him to be his trainer. Are you suggesting that they only had a professional relationship? That they weren't friends? The Klitschko statement alone suggested that it was more than professional. My point is that he wouldn't really miss the money, it'd carry on a legacy and it would up his US stock. I'm seeing it in kind of the way people said Abramovich should help the odd lower league club.
Are you being condescending intentionally? Or am I reading it wrong?