I think it wouldnt make much differebce as corrupt judges would work with that systen as well, and when the judges are just plain wrong,, pac-bradley for example would consensus scoring have still given it to bradley?
Should consensus scoring be used?
This is where if two judges score a round to a particular fighter they get the round, if the judges have it Judge 1: Fighter A, Judge 2:Fighter B and Judge 3: Draw then the round would be 10-10 and so on.
For example consensus scoring would have had Chilemba beating Bellew 116:114 and it would have also had Crolla-Mathews a 115-115 draw, both fair scores in my opinion. Should this system be rolled out to mitigate poor judging when some judges hand in almost random scorecards?
If anyone can work out what result consensus scoring would have given in controversial fights stick them in here so we can see if it really works :lol:
For example consensus scoring would have had Chilemba beating Bellew 116:114 and it would have also had Crolla-Mathews a 115-115 draw, both fair scores in my opinion. Should this system be rolled out to mitigate poor judging when some judges hand in almost random scorecards?
If anyone can work out what result consensus scoring would have given in controversial fights stick them in here so we can see if it really works :lol:
1 - 1 of 33 Posts
1 - 1 of 33 Posts
- This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Boxing Forums
A forum community dedicated to Boxing fans and enthusiasts. Come join the discussion about weigh-ins, matches, rankings, fighting styles, training, live fights, reviews, and more!
Full Forum Listing
Explore Our Forums
Top Contributors this Month
View All
SwollenGoat
194 Replies
Broxi
96 Replies
steviebruno
86 Replies
Recommended Communities
