Joined
·
14,188 Posts
So, I'm watching Berto-Guerrero (great fun fight) and noticing how poor Berto is (relatively speaking) for a former champion.
Berto was built up on a variety of decent journeymen and effectively given a title. His first real test was meant to be Shane Mosley, but the tragedy in Haiti led to that fight being cancelled. He eventually ended up fighting and losing against Victor Ortiz, another largely manufactured fighter. He lost after a good start because really he's a fast handed gunslinger and not a lot else. He makes for fun fights, but not large achievements.
That got me thinking about other Haymon fighters and the two clearest examples for me right now are Danny Garcia and Adrien Broner.
I can imagine Guerrero beating both of those guys. I still don't understand the fuss over Broner, who looks remarkably like Berto to me so far.
Thoughts, feelings?
Berto was built up on a variety of decent journeymen and effectively given a title. His first real test was meant to be Shane Mosley, but the tragedy in Haiti led to that fight being cancelled. He eventually ended up fighting and losing against Victor Ortiz, another largely manufactured fighter. He lost after a good start because really he's a fast handed gunslinger and not a lot else. He makes for fun fights, but not large achievements.
That got me thinking about other Haymon fighters and the two clearest examples for me right now are Danny Garcia and Adrien Broner.
I can imagine Guerrero beating both of those guys. I still don't understand the fuss over Broner, who looks remarkably like Berto to me so far.
Thoughts, feelings?