[errsta]

The guy who came to fight won. Best outcome since that means no rematch. The last card was too wide, but either guy winning by a point or a draw would have been fair.

Lara fought to not lose and arguably did enough to win.

Canelo fought to win and arguably did enough to not lose.

Lara wasn't active enough, Canelo (also not very active) wasn't effective enough.

It was an ugly fight where neither guy really elevated their stature. Both came away with positives (Canelo got the win, Lara set out to befuddle Canelo and he did) and both came away with negatives (Canelo showed he has trouble cutting off the ring, Lara showed that when put a on a big stage he won't fight to win).

Lara showed he has the ability to beat Canelo but lacked the fortitude to ever really assert himself. Canelo showed he has the fortitude to assert himself but may come up short a bit on the skill.

One guy won in spite of himself, the other lost in spite of himself.

Ugly fight that could have gone any way but thankfully the best outcome for the sport.

Would not watch it again.

here's a picture of Tom Jones

 

[Mexi-Box]

So... this is good for the sport why? If anything, it shows that when you face Canelo, you better bring two judges with you 111-117 is ridiculous. Definitely saw that coming since this was an issue in the Trout fight as well.

 

[Doc]

So... this is good for the sport why? If anything, it shows that when you face Canelo, you better bring two judges with you 111-117 is ridiculous. Definitely saw that coming since this was an issue in the Trout fight as well.

One judge fucked up.. Boo hoo don't lose sleep over one idiot.. Thank God two judges had it right..

One preferred canelos work and the other Lara.. One guy overly preferred canelos fight Lmao...

Good post erssta... Like the way you type.

Sent from my XT907 using Tapatalk

 

[errsta]

So... this is good for the sport why? If anything, it shows that when you face Canelo, you better bring two judges with you 111-117 is ridiculous. Definitely saw that coming since this was an issue in the Trout fight as well.

117-111 is ridiculous. Canelo winning is far from ridiculous.I can't think of a time someone fighting someone the stature of Canelo won by employing the nonfightplan that Lara did tonight.

One judge had a bad card - that's not good for the sport. Us not having to see a rematch is good. Sorry, but if you get on a big stage you need to fight to win. Lara did not do that (though he showed, in instances that were too few and far between, that he was more than capable of it).

Oscar did that shit for the last 3-4 rounds against Trinidad and I had zero sympathy for him when it cost him the fight. Lara did this the whole fight and barely outlanded Lara in terms of quantity. Of course the judge's favored the aggressors (who, not coincidentally, is also the star) harder (though fewer..barely) shots.

 

[Mexi-Box]

117-111 is ridiculous. Canelo winning is far from ridiculous.I can't think of a time someone fighting someone the stature of Canelo won by employing the nonfightplan that Lara did tonight.

One judge had a bad card - that's not good for the sport. Us not having to see a rematch is good. Sorry, but if you get on a big stage you need to fight to win. Lara did not do that (though he showed, in instances that were too few and far between, that he was more than capable of it).

Oscar did that shit for the last 3-4 rounds against Trinidad and I had zero sympathy for him when it cost him the fight. Lara did this the whole fight and barely outlanded Lara in terms of quantity. Of course the judge's favored the aggressors (who, not coincidentally, is also the star) harder (though fewer..barely) shots.

If it's an isolated case, okay, not a big deal. As I pointed out, this isn't the first time that has happened.

 

[errsta]

If it's an isolated case, okay, not a big deal. As I pointed out, this isn't the first time that has happened.

Nor will it be the last. Controversial card, non-controversial result. Not the end of the world and hardly a huge injustice.

 

[errsta]

One judge fucked up.. Boo hoo don't lose sleep over one idiot.. Thank God two judges had it right..

One preferred canelos work and the other Lara.. One guy overly preferred canelos fight Lmao...

Good post erssta... Like the way you type.

Sent from my XT907 using Tapatalk

 

[errsta]

but Tom Jones

 

[griffin]

So... this is good for the sport why? If anything, it shows that when you face Canelo, you better bring two judges with you 111-117 is ridiculous. Definitely saw that coming since this was an issue in the Trout fight as well.

Get the feeling you don't like Canelo? Not necessarily from this post, but any reason why?

He is young and seems to want too fight the best even if they have a style that he struggles with.

 

[Doc]

Get the feeling you don't like Canelo? Not necessarily from this post, but any reason why?

He is young and seems to want too fight the best even if they have a style that he struggles with.

It's easy to recognize hate vs criticism and we know where that dude is @ straight up hates canelo..

Sent from my XT907 using Tapatalk

 

[Boogle McDougal]

...





...






....what does this have to do with otters exactly?

 

[Vysotsky]

Lara fought to not lose and arguably did enough to win.

Canelo fought to win and arguably did enough to not lose.

You're a poet and that sums everything up nicely.

 

[genaro g]

The guy who came to fight won. Best outcome since that means no rematch. The last card was too wide, but either guy winning by a point or a draw would have been fair.

Lara fought to not lose and arguably did enough to win.

Canelo fought to win and arguably did enough to not lose.

Lara wasn't active enough, Canelo (also not very active) wasn't effective enough.

It was an ugly fight where neither guy really elevated their stature. Both came away with positives (Canelo got the win, Lara set out to befuddle Canelo and he did) and both came away with negatives (Canelo showed he has trouble cutting off the ring, Lara showed that when put a on a big stage he won't fight to win).

Lara showed he has the ability to beat Canelo but lacked the fortitude to ever really assert himself. Canelo showed he has the fortitude to assert himself but may come up short a bit on the skill.

One guy won in spite of himself, the other lost in spite of himself.

Ugly fight that could have gone any way but thankfully the best outcome for the sport.

Would not watch it again.

here's a picture of Tom Jones

Well said.

 

[errsta]

...

...

....what does this have to do with otters exactly?

I included a picture of a semi-aquatic mammal.

 

[Boogle McDougal]

I included a picture of a semi-aquatic mammal.

I did like that part.

 

[Unloco]

So... this is good for the sport why? If anything, it shows that when you face Canelo, you better bring two judges with you 111-117 is ridiculous. Definitely saw that coming since this was an issue in the Trout fight as well.

what a damn biased canelo hater we have here , shut your carpet bagger ass up

 

[Unloco]

great post errsta

and please Keep Austin weird!!!!

 

[Doc]

You're a poet and that sums everything up nicely.

Hehe erstta the poet... Suits nicely.

Sent from my XT907 using Tapatalk

 

[Mexi-Box]

what a damn biased canelo hater we have here , shut your carpet bagger ass up

Okay, hating on the fact that Canelo is packing judges in there really well. I guess I should be happy, right?

First, what is a carpet bagger? Second, get your shit together; being a nut-licker is bad for your health.

 

[Unloco]

Okay, hating on the fact that Canelo is packing judges in there really well. I guess I should be happy, right?

First, what is a carpet bagger? Second, get your shit together; being a nut-licker is bad for your health.

look it up , matches your profile name perfectly

secondly ive been here for a long time hoe dont be calling me a nutlicker , you follow canelo posts and make a remark on each and every post , if im a nutlicker your a bitter ratchet