Ya neglected to mention, d -- 26 or 29 -- the plane crash that broke Willie's back -- no small considerationand why ??
taking into consideration their four fight series when pep was between 26 and 29 years old.
![]()
yup...correct JG...has to be the main consideration that.....i read somewhere that after that crash one of willies legs was much shorter than the otherYa neglected to mention, d -- 26 or 29 -- the plane crash that broke Willie's back -- no small consideration
Pretty much have the same opinion although if Saddler connected with force I could see him scoring a KOI've always said Pep and will continue to do so. Saddler hit like a middleweight no doubt, but I think he was just a kryptonite to Pep who would have beaten him pre injury for me. I've always considered it a Pacquiao - JMM type
Willie Pep winning a round without throwing a punch was a genuine myth. The fight in question was Jackie Graves, and I believe it was the 3rd roundst. But by all accounts, the fight was a war. It seems very unlikely that Pep won a round in that particular fight without throwing a punch. That's what I have found anywayso flea...in your opinion....did pep win a round of boxing without throwing a punch, based on whats written by him there and what we read was said by ringside reporters
Pep lost SOMETHING of himself, FM? He was a flitting speed merchant with a fused spine and one leg shorter. Ya suppose?Pep is greater but the series works out great with regard to Saddler's standing. Although Pep obviously lost something of himself post-accident, he was still a brilliant fighter of the very highest order. That's the scariest thing: how f'n good did he look before?!
Both bonafide ATGs. Saddler was an ugly, beastly fighter. Hit hard, fought hard and fought rough.
I'm sure I read summat on ESB that was way more convincing in rejecting the myth as just that.so flea...in your opinion....did pep win a round of boxing without throwing a punch, based on whats written by him there and what we read was said by ringside reporters