Boxing Forums banner
1 - 13 of 13 Posts

· Formerly TommyV, resident ESB virgin.
Joined
·
6,770 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
Article Link -http://www.boxingscene.com/?m=show&opt=printable&id=60620#ixzz2FVxzkQCB
This is a legal waiver. By copying and using the material from this article, you agree to give full credit to BoxingScene.com or provide a link to the original article.

By Rick Reeno

BoxingScene.com has been advised by well informed sources that the World Boxing Association is pushing hard for Wladimir Klitschko (59-3, 50KOs) to defend his heavyweight crown against mandatory challenger Alexander Povetkin (25-0, 17KOs).

The sanctioning body notified both sides, by letter, that Wladimir must defend his title against Povetkin by February 26th.

Klitschko was made the WBA's "super champion" a few years ago. The belt became vacant after Klitschko defeated then "regular" champion David Haye last July. Povetkin captured the vacant "regular" title" with a twelve round decision victory over Ruslan Chagaev last August.

The WBA already started a 30 day negotiations period earlier this week. Both sides have until January 17 to reach an agreement or a purse bid will be called. It appears the WBA is going to make it very difficult for Wladimir to receive a special permit to postpone the mandatory obligation, as Wladimir made a voluntary defense against Mariusz Wach last month.
--

Chances of this actually finally happening? :lol:

Noises from Povetkin's camp suggest he wants this fight, but whether that's just all talk remains to be seen as he's been ducking this fight for years. I think he's arguably a worse fighter than he was 4 or 5 years ago and thus even LESS ready for this fight than he was before (which was supposedly the reason he was being kept away).

Either way, I think he would have been in for a one-sided beating. Wlad could do real damage to him if this comes off. I'd still like to see it, as it's one of the bigger fights in the HW division.
 
1 - 13 of 13 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top