You really are very dumb aren't you? Why isn't the best player always the best coach? Why is the best player never the best coach? They should be the expert of all experts according to you.What's @Dealt_with even doing hanging about at CHB? He should be clearly out there making a fortune as boxing's #1 expert.
What do all these bums know about the sport?
Oh wait, they've actually studied the sport, completed and had high level success in the sport... so that means they DKSAB and are in not position to make any judgements
Shows his character, didn't even mention it.
Difference here is each of those instances there was debate.Yeah, the same way I was biased when I thought Bradley beat Pac despite me not liking Bradley or his style. The same way I was biased when I didn't think Salido beat Loma (which was a closer fight than this one). A judge has never been biased or influenced by anything other than what happens in the ring.
Maybe I am biased, but when Lomachenko outlanded Lopez and won more rounds, what am I meant to say? I've already asked for people to point to a round we can analyse together, funny how no one is interested in that. Instead people are posting twitter opinions from people who got punched in the head for a living. A boxer is just about the last person I'd turn to for an accurate scorecard.
Cool, we can talk about opinions all day. I'm not going to change mine for no reason, that would be dishonest. In case you haven't noticed I'm not all that concerned about fitting in. You're right, there isn't debate here... funny that. Not even about the 12th, a round people think was Teo's most dominant. I can go through times and show why Loma won that round, but all I'll get is "But boxers on twitter and everyone else thinks he lost". That's the sort of quality we have judging here.Difference here is each of those instances there was debate.
Almost no one but you and Loma think he won.
I didn't realise you guys left? Doesn't anyone post here when I'm not active?:lol: The circus is back in town.
I am starting to feel guilty about laughing at you because it is sounding more and more like you really have issues.I didn't realise you guys left? Doesn't anyone post here when I'm not active?
Oh he does.I am starting to feel guilty about laughing at you because it is sounding more and more like you really have issues.
No, please laugh. You might be surprised at this, but I can't actually hear you laughing and I don't actually care in the slightest - as I don't know you apart from the dumb things you've posted here. You could be a bot, you say the same repetitive things as everyone. What you say or do means exactly zero to me, you're just a syntactical blob of words on my screen.I am starting to feel guilty about laughing at you because it is sounding more and more like you really have issues.
It has become glaringly obvious that the "Voice of Reason" doesn't speak to you---------------------or maybe it does, but you're not listening.Cool, we can talk about opinions all day. I'm not going to change mine for no reason, that would be dishonest. In case you haven't noticed I'm not all that concerned about fitting in. You're right, there isn't debate here... funny that. Not even about the 12th, a round people think was Teo's most dominant. I can go through times and show why Loma won that round, but all I'll get is "But boxers on twitter and everyone else thinks he lost". That's the sort of quality we have judging here.
Speaking of blobsOh he does.
yeh whatever mate. Every single one of them is so far more qualified than you it's ridiculous you would even bother trying to argue it. You sit on here and make moronic posts about knowing more than anyone else in boxing yet have no significant role at all.You really are very dumb aren't you? Why isn't the best player always the best coach? Why is the best player never the best coach? They should be the expert of all experts according to you.
You are so dumb that you don't even realise you posted comments from people implying they have a personal connection to Lopez. They're not biased at all are they? Wow I should trust their opinions :rofl:rofl
Reason requires reasoning... where exactly is that again? I've explained why people have a distorted perception of the fight, I've offered to go through round 12 (the round that everyone thinks was Teo's best) to show why Lomachenko even won that round. Instead there's ad hominems and appeals to popularity.It has become glaringly obvious that the "Voice of Reason" doesn't speak to you---------------------or maybe it does, but you're not listening.
And Deontay Wilder's ring entrance costume was too heavy and tired out his legs, causing him to lose so badly to Tyson Fury.I just read lomos team now making excuses he had a shoulder injury
You're legit dumb. There aren't qualifications on opinions for subjective sports. You don't get a certificate.yeh whatever mate. Every single one of them is so far more qualified than you it's ridiculous you would even bother trying to argue it. You sit on here and make moronic posts about knowing more than anyone else in boxing yet have no significant role at all.
you could be of as one of the most respected analysts out there maybe even making millions as a commentator on tv etc etc.... yet your here arguing about something EVERYONE else but you can clearly see.
you've lost the plot on this one and with every post you make it's just digging yourself deeper and deeper into your own delusions