straight to the point question.
rigo is still unbeaten and has done much better as a pro.
loma fell short although it was a valiant effort.
was it due to loma getting there too soon and rigo was able to be seasoned very well or overall as a pro rigo is really the better fighter?
rigo is still unbeaten and has done much better as a pro.
loma fell short although it was a valiant effort.
was it due to loma getting there too soon and rigo was able to be seasoned very well or overall as a pro rigo is really the better fighter?