Boxing Forums banner
1 - 20 of 29 Posts

OneTime

· Registered
Joined
·
4,853 Posts
Discussion starter · #1 ·
Big sexy Tyson fury will demolish klit.

Since Manny steward died wlad hasn't looked the same, he's not as patient and doesn't look as composed. His technique is getting worse fight by fight.

Watch his older fights with Manny you see his tight tall stance, now he's getting hit by stupid punches.

Fury is bigger than him, younger, stronger and is pretty damn athletic even for his shape and can hit hard AND is slick.

If wlad wants to beat fury he must get rid of Jonathan stanks and hire someone who isn't a yes man uncle Tom employee.

Fury will ko wlad put your house on it.

Remember to bring this thread back up when fury is crowned the heavyweight champion of the world.
 
Big sexy Tyson fury will demolish klit.

Since Manny steward died wlad hasn't looked the same, he's not as patient and doesn't look as composed. His technique is getting worse fight by fight.

Watch his older fights with Manny you see his tight tall stance, now he's getting hit by stupid punches.

Fury is bigger than him, younger, stronger and is pretty damn athletic even for his shape and can hit hard AND is slick.

If wlad wants to beat fury he must get rid of Jonathan stanks and hire someone who isn't a yes man uncle Tom employee.

Fury will ko wlad put your house on it.

Remember to bring this thread back up when fury is crowned the heavyweight champion of the world.
I agree with you and I intend to bet some money on this fight.
 
i give a fury a decent chance but i certainly wouldnt put my house on it.

whilst a KO is Possible by fury, and i expect fury to have some success, the most likely scenario i envisage is Vlad landing stiff jabs, and by mid rounds Wlad eventually starts to land very hard left hooks and straight rights, eventually stopping fury.
 
I am hoping that this is Wlad's next fight, and I am hoping that the odds are pretty good. That way I can win decent money on the certainty that Wlad will win.
 
I have been saying so long that Fury has a very good chance at beating Wlad and Canelo at beating Golovkin and only now people seem to realize it as well.
Not saying either one would win but they have very good chances and will at least make it a super tough fight.
 
I have been saying so long that Fury has a very good chance at beating Wlad and Canelo at beating Golovkin and only now people seem to realize it as well.
Not saying either one would win but they have very good chances and will at least make it a super tough fight.
I've been saying for ages that Fury could beat Wlad.

Canelo has no chance with Golovkin though.
 
Canelo has the perfect style to beat Golovkin
Absolutely not. If Kirkland can back him up, Golovkin can keep him there. I guess you think Canelo is a heavy puncher because he sparked glass chinned fringe contender Kirkland?

But of course, how stupid of me! Canelo will dictate at ring centre, use his incredible reflexes to slip Golovkin's shots and counter him like he did to shot Angulo!

Gimme' a break.
 
Think I'll pass.

The idea of living in the Dumpster doesn't really appeal for some strange reason.
 
Absolutely not. If Kirkland can back him up, Golovkin can keep him there. I guess you think Canelo is a heavy puncher because he sparked glass chinned fringe contender Kirkland?

But of course, how stupid of me! Canelo will dictate at ring centre, use his incredible reflexes to slip Golovkin's shots and counter him like he did to shot Angulo!

Gimme' a break.
Kirkland is better than Golovkin once he's close o someone Golovkin apparently or his trainer expects his opponents to only run away and train for it they have developed a real puncher mentallity and a bully mentallity he's great at cutting off the ring really great but once he has his opponent there he isn't that great especially defensively but even his shots aren#t AS strong still powerful but that that scary. Ecven Rosado and Stevens had success at spots when they stood their ground vs Golovkin, even Murray did and Monroe won a round and landed some really heavy shots after having been damaged greatly so yes Canelo has a real shot.

Golovkin's defence is much better when the oppoennt is moving away and throwing single shots not to hrut but just to keep GGG away but once someone stands his ground and throws back in powerful combinations WHILE being defensively responsible Golovkin gets hit and is less effective offensively.

You don't beat guys like Golovkin by running they specialize on that you beat them being being smart and defensive responsible while standing your ground. Holyfiled, Douglas and Lewis never beat Tyson by running they stood their ground and Holyfield even went forward and got close. Andre Ward beat Froch not by running by by standing his ground. Hopkins beat trinidad not by running but by standing his ground.

And while it wasn't the healthiest win even Ali didn't beat Foreman by running.

You don't beat guys who specialize on cutting off the ring by fighting the way they expect and want you to fight you have to stand your ground.

And Canelo can't move in any other direction than Forward even against Kirkland he will stand his ground and he is by far the most skilled and most gifted fighter Golovkin has ever fought he will throw combinations with speed and power all whiel having enough defence to not get annihilated but Golovkin will have little defence for someone like Canelo that's the difference.
 
Kirkland is better than Golovkin once he's close o someone Golovkin apparently or his trainer expects his opponents to only run away and train for it they have developed a real puncher mentallity and a bully mentallity he's great at cutting off the ring really great but once he has his opponent there he isn't that great especially defensively but even his shots aren#t AS strong still powerful but that that scary. Ecven Rosado and Stevens had success at spots when they stood their ground vs Golovkin, even Murray did and Monroe won a round and landed some really heavy shots after having been damaged greatly so yes Canelo has a real shot.

Golovkin's defence is much better when the oppoennt is moving away and throwing single shots not to hrut but just to keep GGG away but once someone stands his ground and throws back in powerful combinations WHILE being defensively responsible Golovkin gets hit and is less effective offensively.

You don't beat guys like Golovkin by running they specialize on that you beat them being being smart and defensive responsible while standing your ground. Holyfiled, Douglas and Lewis never beat Tyson by running they stood their ground and Holyfield even went forward and got close. Andre Ward beat Froch not by running by by standing his ground. Hopkins beat trinidad not by running but by standing his ground.

And while it wasn't the healthiest win even Ali didn't beat Foreman by running.

You don't beat guys who specialize on cutting off the ring by fighting the way they expect and want you to fight you have to stand your ground.

And Canelo can't move in any other direction than Forward even against Kirkland he will stand his ground and he is by far the most skilled and most gifted fighter Golovkin has ever fought he will throw combinations with speed and power all whiel having enough defence to not get annihilated but Golovkin will have little defence for someone like Canelo that's the difference.
Canelo isn't as good as you think he is. That is why our opinions differ.
 
Discussion starter · #18 ·
Canelo isn't as good as you think he is. That is why our opinions differ.
I stopped reading when he said Kirklands better inside than golovkin. Kirkland isn't better than golovkin any way you slice it. He is a no chin having bum cut from the same cloth as andre berthoe.

****** ass pseudo boxing experts coming and ruining my thread. Go make a canelhoe cock sucking thread.
 
Kirkland is way too slow and crude to be effective against decent opponents. Look at the Molina fight. He wasnt effective at all. Why? Because he was too crude. Yeah sure he beat Tapia but who the fuck is Tapia?
Canelo saw everything coming against Kirkland. Kirkland just has one gear and skill. Thats to overpower his opponents. He cont do more than that. All in all Kirkland just isnt that good.
I dont think you can judge much from a Canelo-Kirkland or Canelo-Angulo fight for a possible Canelo-Golovkin fight. Golovkin is technically much better than these guys. Has a better defence and punches harder. Canelo has terrible feets. Really is very lame on them. So he will probably stand there. And unlike others I am not that convinced that standing there with Golovkin is that great. Sure you will land your own punches but you are also in a big risk to get hit by Golovkin. And Golovkin can probably take Canelos power anyway. Canelo cant puncht that hard. And at middleweight his power will be even less.
 
I've been saying for ages that Fury could beat Wlad.
I too think Fury has a reasonable chance of beating Wlad, it appears to be becoming a more widely held opinion these days.

18 months ago people would have had you sectioned for stating this. His recent performances have showcased a greater skillset than many previously believed Fury had. He also seems more mentally focussed within fights, resisting the urge for a tear up!

@FleaMan would be interested to hear how you see Fury doing this? Keeping it long and unpredictable by switch hitting and slowly busting Wlad up with the greater volume of punches that Fury throws or by closing the gap, putting relentless pressure on Wlad and fighting on the inside and using his brute strength to neutralise Klitschko's clinching?
 
1 - 20 of 29 Posts