[Cableaddict]

Nobody appreciates fighters coming out with excuses after they lose but it might help explain why Loma performed so poorly. Particularly in rounds 1 -7 when he barely threw a punch.

Nah.

Immediately after the fight, Loma thought he had won. There was no hint from him of any physical ailment.
(Plus it's he was obvious he was fine just by watching the fight.)

 

[Dealt_with]

Can't believe people thought loma could take on Crawford let alone Floyd

Lol what? Crawford would be a far more difficult fight than Floyd. Floyd is made for Loma to dominate (Loma 12-0), I'd pick Crawford to beat Lomachenko.

 

[Dealt_with]

Really good behind the scenes stuff in this video.

Loma all class. Apologizes to his fans for his performance.

A good lesson to young boxers there, always act as if you won the rounds, pretend you're the boss and you might be able to sell it to the judges.

Teo's dad is talking nonsense obviously when he says he's the best coach in the game, but him blowing delusional smoke up his sons backside is what got them the victory. Pretty funny that during the fight he tells his son to box and play it safe in the 12th, then after the fight he's saying that he told him to be aggressive in that round. Oh yeah, Teo Sr. had his son winning every round easily.

Doesn't anybody find it odd that in the replays it's Lomachenko landing clean punches while Lopez is landing glancing blows and punches to his arms? Despite the fact that compubox thinks Lopez landed 148 power punches? Despite Loma's face being less marked up than in his previous five fights?

I obviously don't think much of boxing fans but this fight has shown just how poor the majority are at even knowing what boxing is, no critical thinking or honesty, listening to commentators and being told what they're seeing. Lomachenko knows he won the fight, because he knows boxing and he knows that Teo wasn't landing. Teo thinks he has already won in a round he has been dominated in. There's an honest evaluation and then there's a kid hyping himself up, the Teo's bluff themselves to bluff the judges.
A boxing fan who isn't bullshitting can see what that fight was.

 

[Dealt_with]

You do get put in your place when you are the only person on earth who scores a fight to the other guy though and rightfully so. That is what is happening to you now and you are getting more and more flustered by the hour. Hope this goes on indefinitely. :rofl

I promise I'm not flustered in the slightest, I know Lomachenko won the fight and I know you people are retarded.. so what makes you think I'm emotional in the slightest? I might start getting fired up when someone actually has a point for me to combat. I've only seen people assert that Teo won by appealing to the crowd... so what new information is there for me to deal with? Still waiting for someone to talk boxing with me, funny that.

 

[Pedderrs]

I promise I'm not flustered in the slightest, I know Lomachenko won the fight and I know you people are retarded.. so what makes you think I'm emotional in the slightest? I might start getting fired up when someone actually has a point for me to combat. I've only seen people assert that Teo won by appealing to the crowd... so what new information is there for me to deal with? Still waiting for someone to talk boxing with me, funny that.

You are LITERALLY the only person who watched the fight, other than Loma, that thinks Loma won.

If that doesn't give you pause, I don't know what to say.

 

[tco]

Loma lost. You cannot give an opponent 7 rounds start unless you can knock them out and he never looked like knocking Lopez out.

 

[Dealt_with]

I haven't read all the posts in this thread, but the ones I've read overwhelmingly agree that Loma lost to Lopez------------------------except this poor fucker.

And then to go on and on trying to back up his skewed take on the fight with bullshit after bullshit post is doing nothing but showing the people following this thread he is so butt-hurt it may take months for him to get over it, if that even happens.

I truly don't see how some people can be so delusional that they can't see the obvious, even after looking at it several times like he claims to have done.

I'm barely even a fan of Lomachenko these days, I haven't enjoyed watching him at 135. If by 'get over it' you mean 'pretend that Teo won the fight', then no I will not get over it. Butthurt? Lol, if that's what you'd like to think.

Try looking closely at the fight one time before you claim something is obvious. I'd admit it if I thought Lomachenko lost the fight, the fight was as difficult and as close as the Campbell fight. My response to this fight is exactly the same as that one - a bit underwhelmed at Lomachenko's less than dominant performance. It's exactly the same as that, one time Loma got the decision and the other time he didn't. That makes no difference to me, I can see who won a fight or not. I don't need a judge to tell me anything. I think Salido was closer to beating Lomachenko than Teo, when that decision was announced I wasn't sure what was going happen. When the Teo decision was announced I thought "119-109 isn't fair to Teo", he did better than that.
When they said Teo was the winner honestly I just laughed and thought "man, boxing huh".

 

[Dealt_with]

You are LITERALLY the only person who watched the fight, other than Loma, that thinks Loma won.

If that doesn't give you pause, I don't know what to say.

It does a bit, I thought that there had to be at least a few others that understand and know how to score a boxing match. I guess not hey?
Stil waiting for someone to go through the 'dominant 12th round for Teo' with me :lol:

 

[Dealt_with]

Loma lost. You cannot give an opponent 7 rounds start unless you can knock them out and he never looked like knocking Lopez out.

Oh I agree. You also can't give your opponent 12 rounds and expect to win. But why are we talking about things that didn't happen?

You also can't punch your opponent on the arms, look confident, have the commentators think you're hurting an opponent when you're not even landing, and think that means you actually won the boxing match in reality. That's what happened, while Lomachenko landed clean punches and easily won the fight. Did Lopez ever look like knocking Lomachenko out? If he did then point me to it, so I can show you right now how much you've been influenced by commentators/your perception rather than what actually happened. I put that challenge to you and anyone else.
It should be easy to show me I'm wrong? What's taking everyone so long? It's almost as if there's no video evidence of this 'domination' by Teo :rofl:rofl

 

[Dealt_with]

Nah.

Immediately after the fight, Loma thought he had won. There was no hint from him of any physical ailment.
(Plus it's he was obvious he was fine just by watching the fight.)

I agree, I think Teo's speed and athleticism was just too much for him to get safely inside and do damage.
Teo stopped him getting angles, he nullified Lomachenko's attack well. Let's not talk about the injury as an excuse. Lomachenko did what he could, and he should've got the decision in an awkward fight.

 

[gumbo2176]

I'm barely even a fan of Lomachenko these days, I haven't enjoyed watching him at 135. If by 'get over it' you mean 'pretend that Teo won the fight', then no I will not get over it. Butthurt? Lol, if that's what you'd like to think.

Try looking closely at the fight one time before you claim something is obvious. I'd admit it if I thought Lomachenko lost the fight, the fight was as difficult and as close as the Campbell fight. My response to this fight is exactly the same as that one - a bit underwhelmed at Lomachenko's less than dominant performance. It's exactly the same as that, one time Loma got the decision and the other time he didn't. That makes no difference to me, I can see who won a fight or not. I don't need a judge to tell me anything. I think Salido was closer to beating Lomachenko than Teo, when that decision was announced I wasn't sure what was going happen. When the Teo decision was announced I thought "119-109 isn't fair to Teo", he did better than that.
When they said Teo was the winner honestly I just laughed and thought "man, boxing huh".

I use to think there were only 2 things I'd not want to argue about-------politics and religion simply because people have such strong opinions and nothing you can say or do, no matter how much you try to prove your point, it winds up being a lesson in futility.

Now, thanks to you, I have found a third subject that arguing about is pointless, no matter how overwhelmingly the evidence is in my favor and that everyone else but you can see. That is the outcome of the Loma/Lopez fight. Congratulations on setting a new standard.

I'm through with you on this matter simply because you are totally irrational and delusional if you can't see that everyone who's responded is in agreement that Loma lost and there's no rational argument that can change that outcome.

Get over it man.

 

[gumbo2176]

I agree, I think Teo's speed and athleticism was just too much for him to get safely inside and do damage.
Teo stopped him getting angles, he nullified Lomachenko's attack well. Let's not talk about the injury as an excuse. Lomachenko did what he could, and he should've got the decision in an awkward fight.

WAIT, I thought I was done with this and then I read this post. You agree Teo's speed and athleticism was too much for Loma and he couldn't get inside to do damage plus he stopped Loma from getting angles and nullified his much vaunted offensive attack------------and you STILL want to give the fight to Loma.

Well, that is a partial step in the right direction as opposed to your prior posts stating Loma dominated enough to outright win the fight.

So, keep taking baby steps and one day you may actually admit you are wrong and the best man won. It will do your mental health a world of good.

 

[Bjj_Boxer]

Dealt_with is a troll. Nobody is THAT stupid

 

[Sittin Sonny]

It should be easy to show me I'm wrong? What's taking everyone so long? It's almost as if there's no video evidence of this 'domination' by Teo :rofl:rofl

Sure there is.

 

[OneTime]

Lol what? Crawford would be a far more difficult fight than Floyd. Floyd is made for Loma to dominate (Loma 12-0), I'd pick Crawford to beat Lomachenko.

**** went life and death with a 23 year old rookie.

And got his ass beat.

Got his ass beat bad.

P.S

No one cares how you scored it.

 

[OneTime]

Dealt_with is a troll. Nobody is THAT stupid

He's barely a lomo fan these days guys go easy.

 

[VG_Addict]

I just watched the fight, and TBH, Lopez won more rounds just by being more active.

 

[Philly Shell]

I'm barely even a fan of Lomachenko these days...

You are the biggest Loma fanboy ever. A full blown nuthugger. You barely write about anything else. Your denial knows no bounds.

 

[Philly Shell]

Even with the post-win burst of testosterone you can still see that Teofimo knows he's the inferior animal there, licking his lips and moving around nervously.
I don't know if Teofimo has the nerve to actually step in the ring with Lomachenko. I'd give him big credit just for being willing.

Lopez was more than willing. Where's that 'big credit' you were going to give him?

 

[on the hook]

I'd admit it if I thought Lomachenko lost the fight.

:alfingers

The entire rest of the world admit Loma lost because he did. You are just incapable of admitting it.